06.09.2015 Views

rf - Free and Open Source Software

rf - Free and Open Source Software

rf - Free and Open Source Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

look (electrical) at il. I took my grid dip<br />

meter, <strong>rf</strong> bridge <strong>and</strong> vlvm.<br />

The first thing done was to check the<br />

feed line length. 1/2 wave length at 7.1 MHz<br />

was 492x .68/7.1 or 47.1 feet. Two 1/2<br />

wave lengths (to get into the station) would<br />

be 94.2 feel.<br />

The first conclusion was that the feed line<br />

was 5.8 feet too long.<br />

Next Test No. I was made using the <strong>rf</strong><br />

bridge with results as shown in Fig. 1, the<br />

results being shown in table form <strong>and</strong> also<br />

plotted in graphical form.<br />

, .e "OHMS<br />

".<br />

'0 ..<br />

r., 10<br />

'"'<br />

'-'<br />

"0<br />

'"<br />

,,""<br />

'00<br />

•• " • 0<br />

so ........<br />

" "<br />

--- " ee<br />

, , , ,<br />

/ V<br />

1.1 ., I<br />

•• ' .0 .r<br />

r .e<br />

•• ••<br />

Fig. 1. 100' Feedline Test No.1 .<br />

It was obvious from this graph that the<br />

antenna system was resonating outside the<br />

b<strong>and</strong> as shown by the dotted lines. This test<br />

was repeated <strong>and</strong> the results were taken<br />

down to 6.4 MHz. They showed the system<br />

to be resonant at 6.6 MHz.<br />

Test No.2 was made next using the feed<br />

line cut to 94.2 feet. Fig. 2 shows the<br />

results.<br />

, . e<br />

' .0<br />

1.0'<br />

" t .a<br />

'-'<br />

II OH"'S<br />

"..<br />

41<br />

".<br />

000<br />

·• " •o<br />

so<br />

/ V<br />

V<br />

II<br />

,oc<br />

' .0<br />

,.,<br />

'"'<br />

'-'<br />

" Ol1MS<br />

4'<br />

41<br />

" "<br />

Fig. 3 .<br />

• • ~<br />

000<br />

"<br />

ec<br />

•<br />

2<br />

, .e<br />

91 .2' Feedline Test NO.3.<br />

The resonant point was rising, but not far<br />

enough yel.<br />

Test No.4 was made using the feed line<br />

cut to 88.2 feet long. Fig. 4 shows the<br />

results. It was obvious that we were very<br />

, .e<br />

' .0<br />

7.05<br />

,.,<br />

t.e<br />

r.a<br />

" 011..5<br />

4' .,<br />

"..<br />

"<br />

000<br />

"<br />

"<br />

' .0<br />

' .0<br />

7<br />

.r<br />

, .e<br />

.2<br />

~V<br />

Fig. 4. 88.2' Feedline Test No.4.<br />

close to the resonant frequency of 7.1 MHz<br />

which my friend wished to use.<br />

Test No.5 was with 85.2 feet in the feed<br />

line. Fig. 5 shows the results.<br />

, ec<br />

r c<br />

"t.e<br />

'"'<br />

ROW""S<br />

"<br />

" ec<br />

..<br />

000<br />

"<br />

•• & 50<br />

ee<br />

.,<br />

.2<br />

,<br />

••<br />

••<br />

BAND<br />

I<br />

,<br />

•<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!