06.09.2015 Views

rf - Free and Open Source Software

rf - Free and Open Source Software

rf - Free and Open Source Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Easy Tuning o the<br />

David S. Traer, W4AZ K<br />

625 8 th S treet , South<br />

Nap les, Florida 33940<br />

Multi -Element Quad Antenna<br />

Perhaps the most perplexing <strong>and</strong> o ne of<br />

the most controversial problems facing the<br />

builder of the multi-element quad is element<br />

length or tuning. There are many various articles<br />

on quads each having an individual formula<br />

for element lengths or method of tuning<br />

<strong>and</strong> matching transmission line to driven element.<br />

Basically, there appears to be two<br />

methods of approach. Compromise luning<br />

for broad b<strong>and</strong>ing or " on the button" tuning<br />

for maximum efficiency over a smaller b<strong>and</strong>width.<br />

Since t 95 8, when I first erected a four<br />

element quad, many, many man-hours have<br />

been spent making measurements with receivers<br />

several miles away, field strengt h meters,<br />

vswr meters, impedance bridges, <strong>and</strong> grid dip<br />

meters. At that time, there were no fiberglass<br />

poles, mounting hardware. or any other<br />

information available on multi-elementquads.<br />

It became necessary to find a more or less<br />

foolproof method of tuning <strong>and</strong> matching<br />

for maximum energy transfer, with a minimum<br />

of effort <strong>and</strong> with equipment available<br />

to the average ham. With these points in<br />

mind, I set out to find that method.<br />

Several methods were tried over a period<br />

of time. In each case. the vswr over the entire<br />

b<strong>and</strong> looked good from the transmitter<br />

end-with one exception - t he driven element<br />

was always reactive. It should be well known<br />

that the reactive component of any antenna,<br />

whether inductive or capacitive, does. not<br />

radiate, in addition, the st<strong>and</strong>ing waves along<br />

the transmission line are not at the same point<br />

as they would be with a pure resistive load<br />

mismatched to the transmission line in the<br />

same degree alt hough reactance is also measured<br />

in ohms. The proximity to surrounding<br />

objects does not affect the closed loop of the<br />

quad as much as it would a yagi type ant enna.<br />

Work may be done on the quad much closer<br />

to ground level (15-20 feet) if allowance is<br />

made for a frequency rise of ap proximately<br />

25 to 50 kHz at 14 MHz when the antenna is<br />

put back to forty feet or higher. Therefore,<br />

32<br />

the quad should be tuned to a lower frequency<br />

to eventually come out at the design frequency<br />

unless all tuning is done at the final<br />

antenna height.<br />

One factor that may be difficult for some,<br />

is that all elements must be made accessible.<br />

If not accessible from your tower or pole, a<br />

temporary 2x4 may be set in the ground high<br />

enough to put the boom of the quad at least<br />

fifteen feet above ground level. An allowance<br />

of 50 kHz should be mad e at this height.<br />

Should the diamond configuration be used,<br />

a slightly higher temporary pole would be<br />

necessary. From my tests there has been no<br />

noticeable difference between the diamond or<br />

the square configuration. Some may argue<br />

that the two high current points in the diamond<br />

configuration, being farther apart, would<br />

tend to increase the gain. Theoretically, this<br />

may be true, but no measurable difference<br />

has been noted here.<br />

Let's take an example of a twenty meter<br />

four element quad in the square configuration<br />

to be tuned to a design frequency of<br />

14250 kHz. Tuning to be done at a minimum<br />

height above ground. First, one must buy,<br />

beg, borrow, or build the following equipment<br />

: grid dip meter, vswr meter, antenna<br />

scope or impedance bridge, <strong>and</strong> one friend a<br />

mile or more away. The stat ion receiver. of<br />

course. is also a must. You may use any of<br />

the convenient formulas as a beginning because<br />

in this case we are not interested in the<br />

length of wire as measured in feet <strong>and</strong> inches,<br />

but the results as measured by our eq uipment.<br />

It is always better to have more wire<br />

than needed as it is quite easy to cut off an y<br />

excess. Some use number 10, 12 or 14 solid<br />

copper wire, some aluminum clothes line<br />

wire, or seven st r<strong>and</strong>s of number 20 or 22<br />

plain old antenna wire: which is available at<br />

most all wholesale houses. There are now<br />

many construction articles on multi-element<br />

quads so we will not delve any furt her into<br />

that region.<br />

String the wire <strong>and</strong> place all elements on<br />

73 MAGAZINE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!