21.09.2015 Views

American Airpower Comes of Age

American Airpower Comes of Age - Air University Press

American Airpower Comes of Age - Air University Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ENGLAND<br />

as the Regensburg–Schweinfurt raids <strong>of</strong> 17 August. He criticized<br />

the RAF Spitfires for not attacking the German airfields<br />

there while the Luftwaffe was refueling to make a second<br />

attack on the <strong>American</strong> bombers as they returned to England.<br />

Other complaints involved what he considered the failure <strong>of</strong><br />

the RAF to put long-range tanks on the Spitfire and his assertion<br />

that our “staggering air superiority” was not being used.<br />

Asking for a candid reply to what he said was his candid<br />

assessment, Arnold suggested that we put all our fighters into<br />

“effective <strong>of</strong>fensive action.” 159<br />

Portal solicited comments from Air Marshal Trafford Leigh-<br />

Mallory, then responsible for fighter defense <strong>of</strong> the United<br />

Kingdom, and informed his superior, Secretary <strong>of</strong> State for Air<br />

Archie Sinclair, <strong>of</strong> the contretemps. Leigh-Mallory informed<br />

Portal that instead <strong>of</strong> the 1,000-to-3,000 fighters Arnold estimated<br />

the RAF had, there were approximately 800 operationally<br />

ready fighters, many <strong>of</strong> which were required for the<br />

defense <strong>of</strong> the United Kingdom. He also told Portal that it had<br />

been considered “unlikely,” when the AAF daylight operations<br />

began, that the B-17s would require escort and that, even if<br />

they were needed, they were to be provided by the AAF. Nevertheless,<br />

he wrote that his command was making arrangements<br />

for increasing the range <strong>of</strong> RAF fighters. 160<br />

Portal’s response to Arnold 10 days later was no more polite<br />

than Hap’s. Sarcastically calling Arnold’s letter “incisive” and<br />

“detached,” he insisted that he was operating consistent with<br />

the Pointblank directive. He said the RAF had fewer than half<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> fighters Arnold credited them with and insisted<br />

that one out <strong>of</strong> every three RAF fighters that left the ground in<br />

the previous quarter “did so in order to provide protection for<br />

the Eighth Air Force.” He further wrote that Arnold’s comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> the P-47 with the British Spitfire was not correct and<br />

that any tactical advantage the Eighth had was “largely<br />

thrown away by the slow rate <strong>of</strong> the build-up which you have<br />

achieved.” He alluded to Arnold’s criticism <strong>of</strong> RAF use <strong>of</strong> the P-<br />

51 by stressing the “great deal <strong>of</strong> prejudice,” clearly meaning<br />

from the AAF, about getting that plane into production. In concluding,<br />

however, he indicated that British fighter command<br />

was being reorganized to provide more support for the bomb-<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!