22.09.2015 Views

Association

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98 5. Results II: EuO integration directly on silicon<br />

What is the free parameter which drives the system into one of these regimes? The phase<br />

rule for constant pressures (5.1) evaluates F = 1, a degree of freedom in only one dimension.<br />

This degree of freedom is the temperature of synthesis T S . Via this temperature, the Eu distillation<br />

condition during EuO synthesis is strongly affected by means of partial or complete<br />

re-evaporation of excess Eu, this corresponds to a shift along the O–Eu tie line in the Gibbs<br />

triangle. Therefore, the chemical phases can range from oxidized phases over stoichiometric<br />

EuO to metallic phases. This variation is plotted in Fig. 5.8b with different background colors<br />

revealing the chemical regimes (I), (II), and (III), all depending on the temperature degree of<br />

freedom.<br />

We proceed with the quantitative analysis of EuO/Si interfacial reactions products. The reactions<br />

are evaluated by balancing the Gibbs free energies of formation,<br />

ΔG ◦ =<br />

∑<br />

products<br />

nG ◦ f<br />

−<br />

∑<br />

reactants<br />

mGf ◦ . (after Hess’ law) (5.2)<br />

These balances are not limited to the comparison of bare formation energies G f (T ) directly<br />

from the constituents as presented in the Ellingham diagram. We rather compare oxygen-rich<br />

(I) with Eu-distillation (II–III) chemical regimes during the EuO synthesis in the initial stage<br />

and during sustained growth. Herein, the distillation condition is persistently expressed by<br />

the term (3Eu + O 2 ) and the oxygen-rich synthesis as (Eu + 3/2O 2 ). First, we address the native<br />

metallic silicide EuSi 2 , and then the silicon dioxide SiO 2 . Among ternary compounds, we<br />

limit the discussion to Eu(OH) 3 which is the most probable europium hydroxide. In the case<br />

of a two-dimensional structure, we remark that the energy gain ΔG ◦ is reduced compared to<br />

a volume reaction by the surface energy of the substrate: ΔG ◦ (1×1)<br />

= 113 kJ/mol for (1 × 1)-Si<br />

(001), or ΔG ◦ (2×1)<br />

= 124 kJ/mol for (2 × 1)-Si (001).190<br />

Europium silicide reactions at the EuO/Si interface<br />

temperature (°C)<br />

0 500 1000 1500<br />

200<br />

Gibbs free energy<br />

of formation, G f ° (kJ/mol)<br />

0<br />

-200<br />

-400<br />

-600<br />

-800<br />

-1000<br />

-1200<br />

0<br />

EuSi 2<br />

H-Si (001) surface<br />

EuO<br />

500 1000<br />

temperature (K)<br />

decomposition<br />

1500<br />

2000<br />

Figure 5.9.: Gibbs free energies of<br />

formation for EuO, the H-Si<br />

(001) surface, and EuSi 2 . The<br />

silicide shows crossing to positive<br />

Gibbs free energy, which<br />

indicates a favorable decomposition<br />

at high temperature.<br />

We begin with the thermodynamically least stable compound (Fig. 5.9), Europium silicide<br />

EuSi 2 , notwithstanding being the most serious antagonist to any tunnel functionality due<br />

to its metallic conductivity and paramagnetic behvavior 191 . Despite the likely silicidation<br />

of Si surfaces, thermodynamic data for the native europium silicide EuSi 2 are still missing.<br />

Therefore, a calculation of the formation energy including the temperature dependence is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!