22.09.2015 Views

Association

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.3. Lateral compressive strain: EuO on MgO (100) 81<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Figure 4.22.: EuO/MgO (100):<br />

different epitaxial arrangements.<br />

In (a), a<br />

cube-on-cube relation is<br />

illustrated inducing large<br />

compressive strain to EuO.<br />

In the EuO/MgO 4:5 configuration,<br />

a minimum lateral<br />

strain of +2.4% acts on EuO<br />

(b). If however, EuO keeps<br />

its native lattice parameter<br />

(c), no simple cube-on-cube<br />

relation is realized and<br />

electrostatic distortions will<br />

readily occur.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

fraction, a certain roughness remains and hampers observation of a surface crystal structure<br />

in low energy electron diffraction.<br />

We elucidate the observed initial polycrystalline fraction and the quasi-relaxed EuO growth<br />

at the EuO/MgO (100) interface in terms of geometrical and electrostatical aspects: In Fig. 4.22,<br />

three configurations of the EuO/MgO (100) heteroepitaxy are illustrated assuming different<br />

lateral lattice parameters (e. g. in [010] direction) of the initial EuO layers. From our<br />

structural investigation, we can exclude the direct cube-on-cube heteroepitaxy (in Fig. 4.22a)<br />

comprising large compressive strain, which can be explained as follows: the deposition of<br />

one atomically flat EuO layer on an MgO (100) surface is equivalent to a substitution of the<br />

Mg atoms of the top layer. Here, the ion-size difference 167 forms different sizes of the Mg–O<br />

and the Eu–O bond: in the MgO surface, replacing the Mg 2+ ion with a Eu 2+ ion changes<br />

the cation ionic diameter to 0.234 nm and increases the O–O nearest neighbor bond by 22%<br />

from 0.298 nm to 0.363 nm. 168 In such a case, the ion-size difference would force the Eu or O<br />

atoms to find equilibrium positions in a roughened structure. 27 Considering a second configuration,<br />

a EuO/MgO lateral arrangement of 4:5 as sketched in Fig. 4.22b has a lateral strain<br />

with a minimum value of +2.4%. From an electrostatic view point, strong Coulomb repulsion<br />

between O 2− –O 2− and Eu 2+ –Mg 2+ ions at alternating position would certainly lead to<br />

structural roughening at the interface. From our electron diffraction results, we observe in-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!