22.09.2015 Views

Association

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.4. Hard X-ray photoemission spectroscopy 25<br />

etc. shells). The branching ratio of the two final state peaks is calculated as<br />

I l−s ∗<br />

I l+s ∗<br />

= 2( )<br />

l − 1 2 +1<br />

2 ( l + 1 2<br />

)<br />

+1<br />

= l<br />

l +1 . (2.23)<br />

This reveals intensity ratios of 1:2 for p shells, 2:3 for d shells, and 3:4 for f shells. The spin–<br />

orbit splitting is realized prefereably for heavy elements and deep core-levels. In this thesis,<br />

the deeply bound Eu 3d peak structure is well described by a spin–orbit doublet, but Eu 4d<br />

and lower core-levels require other coupling schemes, as will be discussed in section 2.5.2.<br />

Core-hole polarization. Core-level photoemission always produces a final state with spin<br />

and angular momentum. If the system has a valence state configuration l n with corresponding<br />

spin and orbital momenta, the coupling with the core-hole orbital and angular momenta<br />

leads to different final states. For an s 1 final state, the photohole has a spin of s ∗ = 1/2. This<br />

spin can be either parallel or antiparallel to the net spin S of the valence shell. The exchange<br />

splitting is then<br />

Δ exch (s, l, S)=<br />

( ) 2S +1<br />

G l (s, l), (2.24)<br />

2l +1<br />

where G l (s, l) is the exchange integral. 93 Thereby, the Eu 4s and 5s core-levels exhibit a<br />

double-peak structure which is well-described by this model. 80 Remarkably, this exchange<br />

splitting is largest in the 4s levels of Eu, Gd, and Tb, thus rendering that effect of fundamental<br />

interest. 95<br />

2.4.3. Implications of hard X-ray excitation<br />

Conventional X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) is limited to a probing depth of a<br />

few surface atomic layers. Modern solid state and material science research, however, often<br />

requires the selective probe of buried layers or interfaces in a depth of several hundred<br />

Ångström from the surface. A solution for these experimental needs is the use of hard X-ray<br />

excitation, exceeding the limited probing depth of common XPS experiments.<br />

The first hard X-ray photoemission experiment at hν = 17.4 keV using a Mo anode was carried<br />

out by Nordling, Sokolowski, and Siegbahn 96 in 1957. However, the energy resolution<br />

and brilliance were not sufficient to resolve small chemical shifts or multiplet fine structures.<br />

Subsequently, low energy anodes with Al Kα and Mg Kα radiation were subsequently established,<br />

and synchrotron light up to 1.5 keV enabled a success story of XPS. Nowadays, highly<br />

brilliant synchrotron hard X-ray sources 85,97,98 offer a wealth of experimental opportunities<br />

with an energy resolution down to 0.2 eV. 98,99<br />

An excitation of photoelectrons with hard X-rays implies major differences in view of conventional<br />

XPS. We discuss (i) changed photoemission cross-sections and (ii) Debye-Waller<br />

factors for photoemission, both of which directly affect the photoexcitation process. Finally<br />

(iii), hard X-ray-excited photoelectrons offer a largely increased inelastic mean free path in<br />

the solid, which is a major experimental benefit of HAXPES.<br />

Gd 4s and 5s core-hole polarization was recently discussed in Tober et al. (2013). 94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!