22.09.2015 Views

Association

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.5. Magnetic circular dichroism in core-level photoemission 33<br />

will occur in two groups with six and four final states, respectively. In between the limits of<br />

dominant or negligible spin–orbit interaction (λ ≫ ζ, orλ → 0), the intermediate coupling<br />

scheme is suited to describe the total angular momenta, as seen for the complex example of<br />

Gd 4d. In the following, we express the final state momenta m J for the Eu core orbitals either<br />

via jj or LS-coupling, dependent on their classification on λ in Fig. 2.20.<br />

We begin with a simple orbital: the Eu np 6 shell. In Tab. 2.1, the six final final states are<br />

derived under assumption of a pure spin–orbit coupling of the photoionized p 5 orbital. For<br />

the Eu 3p, the spin–orbit splitting is clearly dominant (ΔE SO = 135 eV, E B = 1500 eV), and<br />

exchange interaction is negligible.<br />

Table 2.2.: Photoemission final states of Eu nd shells in jj-coupling (a) and LS-coupling (b) with the<br />

8 S 7/2 open shell. In this work, we consider orbitals with principal quantum number n = {3; 4}.<br />

(a) jj-coupling. j = + s, J = j i .<br />

core hole<br />

(<br />

m J of<br />

s ∗ m j nd 9 ) (<br />

m j 4f 7 ) final state<br />

+ 1 2<br />

− 1 2<br />

5/2 7/2 6<br />

3/2 7/2 5<br />

1/2 7/2 4<br />

−1/2 7/2 3<br />

−3/2 7/2 2<br />

−5/2 7/2 1<br />

3/2 7/2 5<br />

1/2 7/2 4<br />

−1/2 7/2 3<br />

−3/2 7/2 2<br />

(b) LS-coupling. L = i , S = s i , J = L + S.<br />

core hole<br />

m J of<br />

s ∗ m L m S final state<br />

+ 1 2 2 4 6<br />

1 4 5<br />

0 4 4<br />

−1 4 3<br />

−2 4 2<br />

− 1 2 2 3 5<br />

1 3 4<br />

0 3 3<br />

−1 3 2<br />

−2 3 1<br />

We proceed with the Eu nd 10 orbitals, which show a characteristic multiplet structure in<br />

Eu 110,111 and Gd 112 compounds. In Tab. 2.2 (a), we discuss the final states for jj-coupling,<br />

which is a good assumption for the deeply bound Eu 3d core-levels due to their large spin–<br />

orbit interaction of ΔE SO = ∼30 eV and deep binding (E B = 1125 eV). In the 4d core-levels,<br />

however, which are more weakly bound at ∼120 eV, the spin–orbit interaction is weaker.<br />

Thus, a suitable model for the Eu 4d level is the LS-coupling (Tab. 2.2 (b)) showing two parts<br />

of the multiplet, from m J =2...6 in the low binding energy part and m J =1...5 at higher<br />

binding energy. The best description for the Eu 4d spectra, however, is the more complex<br />

intermediate coupling. For a comprehensive discussion on the 4d final states, we may refer<br />

to literature. 112–115<br />

A significant spectral separation due to intra-atomic exchange splitting can be observed in<br />

the Eu ns 1 orbital of the photoemission final state. Due to the effect of core polarization (as<br />

described in Ch. 2.4.2), the core hole with spin s ∗ can be aligned either parallel or antiparallel<br />

with respect to the spin-aligned 8 S J open 4f shell. 116 This yields two spectral features, which<br />

can be practically observed for Eu 3s (weak), 4s and 5s photoemission, as listed in Tab. 2.3. In<br />

this work, we show only the Eu 4s orbital due to its large cross-section and exchange splitting.<br />

Finally, we consider the Eu 4f 7 level. Upon 4f photoemission, the finals states are created as<br />

∣<br />

〉<br />

∣4f 7 ; 8 photoionization<br />

S J −→<br />

∣<br />

∣4f 6 ; 7 F J ; εl 〉 . (2.35)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!