22.09.2015 Views

Association

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.1. Coherent growth: EuO on YSZ (100) 63<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Figure 4.4.: Magnetic properties of a 20 nm single-crystalline EuO (100) film with M measured inplane<br />

and out-of-plane. The measurement was conducted by B. Zijlstra.<br />

All EuO lattice parameters agree well with bulk EuO. In conclusion, we confirm a seamless<br />

coherent growth of EuO on conductive YSZ (100) by HR-TEM.<br />

A key property of EuO is its ferromagnetic behavior. In Fig. 4.4, the temperature dependent<br />

magnetization curves and the hysteresis curves are depicted for a 20 nm EuO thin film coherently<br />

grown on YSZ (100). Both in-plane and out-of-plane magnetization curves follow the<br />

shape of a Brillouin function. A large difference is observed in the magnetic switching behavior:<br />

the coercive field for in-plane magnetic switching along the [100] direction shows a low<br />

value of H c = 43 Oe which is indicative for a good crystallinity of EuO. For the out-of-plane direction,<br />

in contrast, the coercive field exhibits an eight times larger value of H c = 329 Oe, and<br />

the saturation magnetization cannot be reached. The reduced magnetization in out-of-plane<br />

direction can be explained by the significant fraction of interface and surface layers of EuO<br />

with reduced nearest neighbor coordination, as predicted by Schiller and Nolting (2001). <br />

Mainly three different anisotropy contributions determine the magnetic switching: crystalline<br />

anisotropy, shape anisotropy and pinning by defects. The crystalline anisotropy is<br />

weak in EuO, and the shape anisotropy is dominant. We distinguish between in-plane and<br />

out-of-plane anisotropy. A measure for the magnetic anisotropy is the anisotropy constant in<br />

first order K 1 , expressed as 54<br />

K 1 = −1/2H an σ sat . (4.1)<br />

Here, H an denotes the anisotropy field which is necessary to saturate the magnetic sample<br />

to the saturation moment σ sat in the magnetic easy direction, to which H an is parallel.<br />

For our single-crystalline EuO thin film, we determine the out-of-plane anisotropy as<br />

K1 ⊥ (cryst. film) = −0.851 × 105 erg/g. We compare this out-of-plane anisotropy with a polycrystalline<br />

EuO thin film (d = 100 nm) from literature, 150,151 for which K1 ⊥ (poly. film) =<br />

−9.3 × 10 5 erg/g was found. The large difference of magnetic anisotropy between polycrystalline<br />

and single-crystalline EuO thin films can be explained by magnetic pinning: while<br />

in polycrystalline EuO the pinning of magnetic moments due to crystalline defects is omnipresent,<br />

in single-crystalline EuO without defects, one would expect this pinning effect to<br />

vanish. Indeed, in single-crystalline EuO the shape anisotropy is smaller by a factor of ten<br />

than for the polycrystalline EuO film.<br />

For EuO thin film effects, please see Fig. 2.8 on p. 15.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!