Research Journal of Economics & Business Studies - RJEBS - The ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TO FIND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STOCK MARKET EXPERIENCE AND BUYING MOTIVE Relationship between Stock Market Experience and Buying Motive Table No.3 Stock Market Experience and buying motive Cross tabulation Stock market experience Buying motive Stock market experience Pearson Correlation 1 -.114 Sig. (2-tailed) .257 N 100 100 Buying motive Pearson Correlation -.114 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .257 N 100 100 Inference: Since the table value is -.114 there is no significant relationship between stock market experienceand buying motive of securities. TO FIND RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INCOME AND INVESTMENT SIZE Table No. 5 Relationship between Income and Investment Size Income Investment Size Cross tabulation Individual Annual Income Investment Size Individual Annual Income Pearson Correlation 1 .123 Sig. (2-tailed) .224 N 100 100 Investment Size Pearson Correlation .123 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .224 N 100 100 Inference: Since the value is .123 there exists a least positive correlation between income and investment size. TO FIND RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STOCK MARKET EXPERIENCE AND COMFORTABLE FLUCTUATIONS WITHIN 6 MONTHS Table No. 6. Relationship between Stock Market Experience and Comfortable Fluctuations within 6 Months Stock Market Experience * Comfortable Fluctuations within 6 Months Cross tabulation Stock Market Comfortable fluctuations within Experience 6 months Stock Market Experience Pearson 1 -.017 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .864 N 100 100 Comfortable fluctuations within Pearson -.017 1 6 months Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .864 N 100 100 Inference: Since the value is -.017 there exists a negative correlation stock market experience and comfortable fluctuations within 6 months. www.theinternationaljournal.org > RJEBS: Volume: 02, Number: 09, July-2013 Page 16
FACTOR ANALYSIS FACTOR ANALYSIS FOR NORMATIVE AND INFORMATIONAL CONFORMITY BEHAVIOR OF THE INVESTOR The present study included 7 variables to measure the factors which influence the behavior of the investor. The selected investors were asked to rate the 7 variables at five point scale on the basis of their preference. The score on these 7 variables are included for the factor analysis in order to narrate the variables into factors and to know which factor has more impact on the investors’ behavior. Table No.7: Factor Loading For Investor’s Normative and Informational Conformity Behavior KMO and Bartlett's Test Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .576 Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 26.782 Df 10 Sig. .003 Component Initial Eigen values Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Total % of Cumulative Total % of Cumulative Variance % Variance % Consent of others in buying the 1.604 32.088 32.088 1.604 32.088 32.088 stock Procure same stocks as others 1.125 22.497 54.585 1.125 22.497 54.585 Stock selection parallel to others .918 18.364 72.949 Update folks regarding .687 13.747 86.696 buying/selling the stocks Explore about unfamiliar stocks .665 13.304 100.000 The 5 variables related to the factors which influence the normative and informational conformity behavior are clustered together and shown in the above table with their Eigen values. The Eigen value indicates to how far a variable has an impact on investors’ criteria for stock selection. Inference: From the above result of factor analysis of normative and informational conformity behavior, referring to the Eigen values it can be inferred that consent of others in buying the stock, procure same stocks as others has a major impact in determining normative and informational conformity behavior since they are greater than the Eigen value 1.since KMO is >.5 the factor analysis is appropriate. ONE WAY ANOVA: TO FIND ASSOCIATION BETWEEN INVESTORS’ PROFILE VARIABLES AND RISK SEEKING BEHAVIOR OF THE INVESTOR Null Hypothesis, H0: Difference = 0, i.e. there is no significant difference between the investors’ profile variables and risk seeking behavior of the investor Alternate Hypothesis, H1: Difference ≠ 0, i.e. there is significant difference between the investors’ profile variables and risk seeking behavior of the investor www.theinternationaljournal.org > RJEBS: Volume: 02, Number: 09, July-2013 Page 17
Page 2 and 3: Table of Contents Articles THE GLOB
Page 4 and 5: The capital market of a country can
Page 6 and 7: Figure 1: Components of Indian Fina
Page 8 and 9: esults as regards the stability of
Page 10 and 11: 10. Hasan, M., K., Haque, M., & Law
Page 12 and 13: In the first stage of development,
Page 14 and 15: References: 1. Krishnamacharyulu CS
Page 16 and 17: and the additional procedures neede
Page 20 and 21: Table No.8: Association between Inv
Page 22 and 23: The foremost factor to be considere
Page 24 and 25: economic and social. Some people ma
Page 26 and 27: eliance, and transparency (Gain Raj
Page 28 and 29: loans/borrowings has been invested
Page 30 and 31: Pressure Nowadays, management is in
Page 32 and 33: includes the red flags that were ex
Page 34 and 35: sec110.01). However, it did establi
Page 36 and 37: The Impact of Macroeconomic Factors
Page 38 and 39: Bajaj 2.53 0.003 4.38 0.24 1.68 -0.
Page 40 and 41: Nestle 2012 ITC 2012 Q1 -0.28 -0.28
Page 42 and 43: Suzuki 2011 .22 1.82 1.91 1.87 1.99
Page 44 and 45: performance performance From the ab
Page 46 and 47: 7 FINDINGS Risk Return Analysis In
Page 48 and 49: 1. Review of Literature Table 1: Su
Page 50 and 51: Building on the Markowitz framework
Page 52 and 53: NFL -4064 -8453 -2516 -3477 -1995 -
Page 54 and 55: Ochsner Robert C (1995), “Welcome
Page 56 and 57: quality measures the outcome of ser
Page 58 and 59: Out of 207 respondents, 108 respond
Page 60 and 61: check-in counters was provided. Ade
Page 62 and 63: esources to the best utilisation in
Page 64 and 65: ABSTRACT The State-Enterprise Exper
Page 66 and 67: Source: IE Singapore 2011/2012 Sing
Page 68 and 69:
on a major property development pro
Page 70 and 71:
given that the market at the time o
Page 72 and 73:
Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. 2008.
Page 74 and 75:
Table 1.Gross NPA of Nationalised B
Page 76 and 77:
References 1.Internet Banking in In
Page 78 and 79:
In addition, innovation implies inv
Page 80 and 81:
esearch evidence by Mosey, Clare an
Page 82 and 83:
26. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (199
Page 84 and 85:
Similarly each organization is face
Page 86 and 87:
working capital management impacts
Page 88 and 89:
TABLE.2. SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN WOR
Page 90 and 91:
INTERPRETATION: The current ratio s
Page 92 and 93:
INTERPRETATION: The working capital
Page 94 and 95:
(Net worth =paid capital +reserve &
Page 96 and 97:
Corporate Governance and Sustainabi
Page 98 and 99:
quality. Derivation of this index w
Page 100 and 101:
Environmental, and Natural Resource
Page 102 and 103:
has a deeper message, one that has
Page 104 and 105:
www.theinternationaljournal.org > R
Page 106 and 107:
2010).The process of financialisati
Page 108 and 109:
.) The Tools Tools for data collect
Page 110 and 111:
14000000 12000000 10000000 8000000
Page 112 and 113:
40000000 30000000 20000000 10000000
Page 114 and 115:
gifts at the time of marriage. Rece
show all

Research Journal of Economics & Business Studies - RJEBS - The ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?