20.10.2015 Views

A COMPENDIUM OF SCALES for use in the SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING AND LEARNING

compscalesstl

compscalesstl

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Scale of Service-Learn<strong>in</strong>g Involvement (SSLI)<br />

Developed by Olney and Grande (1995), this 60-item questionnaire yields scores on three<br />

subscales: (a) Exploration (i.e., <strong>in</strong>itial reasons <strong>for</strong> volunteer<strong>in</strong>g); (b) Realization (i.e., cont<strong>in</strong>ual<br />

reasons <strong>for</strong> volunteer<strong>in</strong>g); and (c) Internalization (i.e., volunteer<strong>in</strong>g to help solve social<br />

problems). Cronbach alpha coefficients range from .70 to .84. Convergent and divergent validity<br />

was established with <strong>the</strong> Intellectual Development Scale and <strong>the</strong> Moral Development Measure,<br />

respectively.<br />

Service-Learn<strong>in</strong>g Course Quality<br />

Developed by Moely and Ilustre (2014) and derived from an earlier version developed by Furco<br />

and Moely (2006) to assess student views of service-learn<strong>in</strong>g courses <strong>in</strong> terms of hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

attributes that are considered important. This 12-item self-report measure assesses servicelearn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

attributes on three subscales: (a) Value of Service (i.e., I feel that my service-learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

activity was worthwhile); (b) Focus on Service (i.e., <strong>the</strong> community organization <strong>in</strong> which I<br />

worked was ready to receive service-learn<strong>in</strong>g students); and (c) Opportunities <strong>for</strong> Reflection<br />

(i.e., I had opportunities to reflect on my service-learn<strong>in</strong>g through discussions with faculty,<br />

students and community members. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12-items is .93 and<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal consistency <strong>for</strong> each scale ranges from .72 to .90.<br />

Student Learn<strong>in</strong>g from Community Service Instrument<br />

Developed by Subramony (2000), this 10-item self-report measure assesses students’ perceived<br />

effectiveness <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g service-learn<strong>in</strong>g goals. This measure is <strong>use</strong>d <strong>in</strong> conjunction with <strong>the</strong><br />

Feedback Disposition Instrument and <strong>the</strong> Goal Oriented Instrument. The Feedback Disposition<br />

Instrument measures student propensity to seek or avoid feedback, and <strong>the</strong> Goal Oriented<br />

Instrument measures students as learn<strong>in</strong>g or per<strong>for</strong>mance goal-oriented. Cronbach alpha<br />

coefficients range from .68 to .81.<br />

Three Aspects of Engagement<br />

Developed by Gall<strong>in</strong>i and Moely (2003), this 27-item self-report questionnaire yields scores on<br />

three scales: (a) Community Engagement (i.e., feel<strong>in</strong>g connected to <strong>the</strong> community); (b)<br />

Academic Engagement (i.e., satisfaction with <strong>the</strong> academic course and university); and (c)<br />

Interpersonal Engagement (i.e., <strong>the</strong> course's <strong>in</strong>fluence on students’ ability to work with o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

effectively). Cronbach alpha coefficients range from .85 to .98.<br />

Quality of Learn<strong>in</strong>g Environment<br />

Developed by Br<strong>in</strong>gle, Hatcher, and Muthiah (2010), this 24-item self-report questionnaire<br />

measures student perceptions of learn<strong>in</strong>g environment components, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> extent to<br />

which students experience peer or faculty <strong>in</strong>teraction, course satisfaction, perceived learn<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

active learn<strong>in</strong>g, and personal relevance components that contribute to high quality learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

environments (i.e., I have developed a significant relationship with at least one student <strong>in</strong> this<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!