References References marked with an asterisk <strong>in</strong>dicate a scale. Buskist, W. (2013). Prepar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> new psychology professoriate to teach: Past, present, and future. Teach<strong>in</strong>g of Psychology, 40, 333-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628313501047 *Buskist, W., Sikorski, J., Buckley, T., & Saville, B. K. (2002). Elements of master teach<strong>in</strong>g. In S. F. Davis & W. Buskist (Eds.), The teach<strong>in</strong>g of psychology: Essays <strong>in</strong> honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer (pp. 27-39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. *Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Fe<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences <strong>in</strong> cognitive motivation: The life and times of <strong>in</strong>dividuals vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> need <strong>for</strong> cognition. Psychological Bullet<strong>in</strong>, 119, 197-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 Christopher, A. N., Furnham, A., Batey, M., Mart<strong>in</strong>, G. N., Koenig, C. S., & Doty, K. (2010). Protestant ethic endorsement, personality, and general <strong>in</strong>telligence. Learn<strong>in</strong>g and Individual Differences, 20, 46-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.l<strong>in</strong>dif.2009.10.003 Daniel, D. B., & Chew, S. (2013). The tribalism of teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g. Teach<strong>in</strong>g of Psychology, 40, 363-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628313501034 *Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Mat<strong>the</strong>ws, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion <strong>for</strong> long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087- 1101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 *Gosl<strong>in</strong>g, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of <strong>the</strong> Big-Five personality doma<strong>in</strong>s. Journal of Research <strong>in</strong> Personality, 37, 504-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.20071 *Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiat<strong>in</strong>g hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491 Gurung, R. A. R. (2015). Best practices <strong>in</strong> scale <strong>use</strong> <strong>in</strong> SoTL. In R. S. Jhangiani, J. Troisi, B. Fleck, A. M. Legg, & H. D. Hussey (Eds.), A compendium of scales <strong>for</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scholarship of teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g. *Keeley, J., Smith, D., & Buskist, W. (2006). The Teach<strong>in</strong>g Behaviors Checklist: Factor analysis of its utility <strong>for</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g teach<strong>in</strong>g. Teach<strong>in</strong>g of Psychology, 33, 84-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3302_1 McCabe, J. A. (2015). Learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Introductory Psychology: Exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> generation effect <strong>for</strong> mnemonics and examples. Teach<strong>in</strong>g of Psychology, 42, 203-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628315587617 Meriac, J. P., Slifka, J. S., & LaBat, L. R. (2015). Work ethic and grit: An exam<strong>in</strong>ation of empirical redundancy. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 401-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.009 *Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehe, M. L., Urdan, T., Anderman, L. H., Anderman, E., & Roesner, R. (1998). The development and validation of scales assess<strong>in</strong>g students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113-131. *Miller, M. J., Woehr, D. J., & Hudspeth, N. (2002). The mean<strong>in</strong>g and measurement of work ethic: Construction and <strong>in</strong>itial validation of a multidimensional <strong>in</strong>ventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 451-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1838 26
*Oleson, K. C., Poehlmann, K. M., Yost, J. H., Lynch, M. E., & Ark<strong>in</strong>, R. M. (2000). Subjective overachievement: Individual differences <strong>in</strong> self-doubt and concern with per<strong>for</strong>mance. Journal of Personality, 68, 491-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00104 Richmond, A. S. (2015). The miss<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>k(s) of SoTL scales: One researcher’s perspective. In R. S. Jhangiani, J. D. Troisi, B. Fleck, A. M. Legg, & H. D. Hussey (Eds.), A compendium of scales <strong>for</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scholarship of teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of <strong>the</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g sciences, preface. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Wilson-Doenges, G. (2015). The state of scale validation <strong>in</strong> SoTL research <strong>in</strong> psychology. In R. S. Jhangiani, J. Troisi, B. Fleck, A. M. Legg, & H. D. Hussey (Eds.), A compendium of scales <strong>for</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scholarship of teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g. 27
- Page 1 and 2: A COMPENDIUM OF SCALES for use in t
- Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introd
- Page 5 and 6: Chapter 1: Introduction Rajiv S. Jh
- Page 7 and 8: and boredom; whereas the former inc
- Page 9 and 10: References Bishop-Clark, C. & Dietz
- Page 11 and 12: Chapter 2: Best Practices in Scale
- Page 13 and 14: o Participants respond to items suc
- Page 15 and 16: - Be aware of whether the scale is
- Page 17 and 18: References References marked with a
- Page 19 and 20: *Wielkiewicz, R. M. & Meuwissen, A.
- Page 21 and 22: example, McCabe (2015) examined the
- Page 23 and 24: psychometrically sound tool. Howeve
- Page 25: a history of the authors’ work do
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 4: A Primer on Scale Develo
- Page 31 and 32: scales or develop new ones. In eith
- Page 33 and 34: found their 40-item measure could b
- Page 35 and 36: eflect overall teacher behaviors or
- Page 37 and 38: Although there is some variability
- Page 39 and 40: and/or do not correlate with instru
- Page 41 and 42: Fraley, R. C., & Vazire, S. (2014).
- Page 43 and 44: Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at
- Page 45 and 46: Psychology, 36 of the 47 articles (
- Page 47 and 48: Assessing and Reporting Validity In
- Page 49 and 50: Grades Another common source of alr
- Page 51 and 52: References References marked with a
- Page 53 and 54: model of collaborative undergraduat
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 6: Measuring Learning and S
- Page 57 and 58: joins a new team to teach them abou
- Page 59 and 60: Summative Assessments Summative Rub
- Page 61 and 62: programs. In a national survey of p
- Page 63 and 64: Course Outcomes Scale Centra and Ga
- Page 65 and 66: discuss The Motivated Strategies fo
- Page 67 and 68: The Motivated Strategies for Learni
- Page 69 and 70: References References marked with a
- Page 71 and 72: Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Bahbabani
- Page 73 and 74: Stoloff, M. L., & Feeney, K. J. (20
- Page 75 and 76: interpretation of analogies is an a
- Page 77 and 78:
Similar difficulties in accurately
- Page 79 and 80:
How do we balance the need for effi
- Page 81 and 82:
References References marked with a
- Page 83 and 84:
*Halpern, D. F. (2010). Halpern Cri
- Page 85 and 86:
Appendix: A Compendium of General C
- Page 87 and 88:
Chapter 8: Student Engagement Towar
- Page 89 and 90:
particular items. Indeed, a point o
- Page 91 and 92:
employing the SCEQ have shown other
- Page 93 and 94:
one of eight achievement emotions m
- Page 95 and 96:
Recent efforts (Saddler, Sonnert, H
- Page 97 and 98:
References References marked with a
- Page 99 and 100:
64, 847-860. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.
- Page 101 and 102:
*Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., Gon
- Page 103 and 104:
course. Pretest and posttest survey
- Page 105 and 106:
Perceptions 7 Problem-Solving 1 Sat
- Page 107 and 108:
Culture and Issues Knowledge of Cur
- Page 109 and 110:
Civic Attitudes and Skills Question
- Page 111 and 112:
Scale of Service-Learning Involveme
- Page 113 and 114:
engagement and psychological measur
- Page 115 and 116:
Giles, D. E., & Eyler, J. (2013). T
- Page 117 and 118:
Appendix A: Research Measures for M
- Page 119 and 120:
Robby, M.A. -CASQ -SAT/9 Scores -¹
- Page 121 and 122:
Steinberg, K. S., Hatcher, J. A., B
- Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 10: Measuring Individual Di
- Page 125 and 126:
either unnecessary or is referenced
- Page 127 and 128:
Park, 2005). The merit of the instr
- Page 129 and 130:
Similar factor structures were prod
- Page 131 and 132:
References References marked with a
- Page 133 and 134:
Chapter 11: Measuring Well-Being in
- Page 135 and 136:
items, and the PANAS 44 items, and
- Page 137 and 138:
Meaning in Life The Meaning in Life
- Page 139 and 140:
future,” using a 5-point scale (1
- Page 141 and 142:
Domain-Specific Stress and Anxiety
- Page 143 and 144:
demonstrate peoples' varying levels
- Page 145 and 146:
Gehlbach, H. (2015). Seven survey s
- Page 147 and 148:
Ritchie, R. A., Meca, A., Madrazo,
- Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 12: Assessing Professor-Stu
- Page 151 and 152:
ends with some unanswered questions
- Page 153 and 154:
positively about their professors
- Page 155 and 156:
The PSRS underwent further validati
- Page 157 and 158:
help or hinder the graduate student
- Page 159 and 160:
Komarraju, M. (2013). Ideal teacher
- Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 13: Effective Tools for Ass
- Page 163 and 164:
offer guidance based on their exper
- Page 165 and 166:
The Original TBC Study Our approach
- Page 167 and 168:
student/faculty rating with critica
- Page 169 and 170:
eveals that five qualities (knowled
- Page 171 and 172:
References References marked with a
- Page 173 and 174:
*Wann, P.D. (2001, January). Facult
- Page 175 and 176:
Nessie the Mythical Loch Ness Monst
- Page 177 and 178:
components of knowledge of cognitio
- Page 179 and 180:
a cognitive activity (Cacioppo et a
- Page 181 and 182:
teacher? In other words, how do we
- Page 183 and 184:
Christopher (2015) also suggests th
- Page 185 and 186:
Kirk, C., Busler, J., Keeley, J., &