Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and ef<strong>for</strong>t regulation matter? Learn<strong>in</strong>g and Individual Differences, 25, 67- 72. doi:10.1016/j.l<strong>in</strong>dif.2013.01.005 Komarraju, M., Ramsey, A., & R<strong>in</strong>ella, V. (2013). Cognitive and non-cognitive predictors of college read<strong>in</strong>ess and per<strong>for</strong>mance: Role of academic discipl<strong>in</strong>e. Learn<strong>in</strong>g and Individual Differences, 24, 103-109. doi:10.1016/j.l<strong>in</strong>dif.2012.12. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., and Lark<strong>in</strong>, K. C. (1986). Self-efficacy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> prediction of academic per<strong>for</strong>mance and perceived career options. Journal of Counsel<strong>in</strong>g Psychology 33, 265– 269. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.33.3.265 Morl<strong>in</strong>g, B. (2015). Research methodology <strong>in</strong> psychology: Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> world of <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation (2e). New York: Norton. National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Bra<strong>in</strong>, m<strong>in</strong>d, experience and school. Committee on <strong>the</strong> Foundations of Assessment. Pelligr<strong>in</strong>o, J., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC: National Academy Press. Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> scale development. Structural Equation Model<strong>in</strong>g, 10, 622-647. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM1004 *P<strong>in</strong>trich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, G. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of <strong>the</strong> motivated strategies <strong>for</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813. doi: 10.1177/0013164493053003024 Robb<strong>in</strong>s, S., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychological and study skill factors predict college outcome? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bullet<strong>in</strong>, 130, 261–288. *Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assess<strong>in</strong>g metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1994.1033 Schwartz, E., & Gurung, R. A. R., (2012). Evidence-based teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> higher education. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC: American Psychological Association. *Solberg, V. S., O’Brien, K., Villareal, P., Kennel, R., and Davis, B. (1993). Self-efficacy and Hispanic college students: Validation of <strong>the</strong> college self-efficacy <strong>in</strong>strument. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 15, 80–95. doi: 10.1177/07399863930151004 *Sosu, E. M. (2013). The development and psychometric validation of a critical th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g disposition scale. Th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Skills and Creativity, 9, 107-119. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002 *Tuckman, B. W. (1991). The development and concurrent validity of <strong>the</strong> procrast<strong>in</strong>ation scale. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 51, 473-480. doi: 10.1177/0013164491512022 *Tuncer, M. & Kaysi, F. (2013). The development of <strong>the</strong> metacognitive th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g skills scale. International Journal of Learn<strong>in</strong>g and Development, 3, 70-76. doi: 10.5296/ijld.v3i2.3449 *Valenzuela, J., Nieto, A. M., & Saiz, C. (2011). Critical th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g motivational scale: a contribution to <strong>the</strong> study of relationship between critical th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and motivation. Electronic Journal of Research <strong>in</strong> Educational Psychology, 9, 823-848. *Wells, A. & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A short <strong>for</strong>m of <strong>the</strong> metacognitions questionnaire: properties of <strong>the</strong> MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 385-396. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00147-5 18
*Wielkiewicz, R. M. & Meuwissen, A. S. (2014). A lifelong learn<strong>in</strong>g scale <strong>for</strong> research and evaluation of teach<strong>in</strong>g and curricular effectiveness. Teach<strong>in</strong>g of Psychology, 41, 220-227. doi: 10.1177/0098628314537971 *Zajacova, A., Lynch, S. M., & Epenshade, T. J. (2005). Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success <strong>in</strong> college. Research <strong>in</strong> Higher Education, 46, 677-706. doi: 10.1007/s11162-004-4139-z 19
- Page 1 and 2: A COMPENDIUM OF SCALES for use in t
- Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introd
- Page 5 and 6: Chapter 1: Introduction Rajiv S. Jh
- Page 7 and 8: and boredom; whereas the former inc
- Page 9 and 10: References Bishop-Clark, C. & Dietz
- Page 11 and 12: Chapter 2: Best Practices in Scale
- Page 13 and 14: o Participants respond to items suc
- Page 15 and 16: - Be aware of whether the scale is
- Page 17: References References marked with a
- Page 21 and 22: example, McCabe (2015) examined the
- Page 23 and 24: psychometrically sound tool. Howeve
- Page 25 and 26: a history of the authors’ work do
- Page 27 and 28: *Oleson, K. C., Poehlmann, K. M., Y
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 4: A Primer on Scale Develo
- Page 31 and 32: scales or develop new ones. In eith
- Page 33 and 34: found their 40-item measure could b
- Page 35 and 36: eflect overall teacher behaviors or
- Page 37 and 38: Although there is some variability
- Page 39 and 40: and/or do not correlate with instru
- Page 41 and 42: Fraley, R. C., & Vazire, S. (2014).
- Page 43 and 44: Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at
- Page 45 and 46: Psychology, 36 of the 47 articles (
- Page 47 and 48: Assessing and Reporting Validity In
- Page 49 and 50: Grades Another common source of alr
- Page 51 and 52: References References marked with a
- Page 53 and 54: model of collaborative undergraduat
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 6: Measuring Learning and S
- Page 57 and 58: joins a new team to teach them abou
- Page 59 and 60: Summative Assessments Summative Rub
- Page 61 and 62: programs. In a national survey of p
- Page 63 and 64: Course Outcomes Scale Centra and Ga
- Page 65 and 66: discuss The Motivated Strategies fo
- Page 67 and 68: The Motivated Strategies for Learni
- Page 69 and 70:
References References marked with a
- Page 71 and 72:
Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Bahbabani
- Page 73 and 74:
Stoloff, M. L., & Feeney, K. J. (20
- Page 75 and 76:
interpretation of analogies is an a
- Page 77 and 78:
Similar difficulties in accurately
- Page 79 and 80:
How do we balance the need for effi
- Page 81 and 82:
References References marked with a
- Page 83 and 84:
*Halpern, D. F. (2010). Halpern Cri
- Page 85 and 86:
Appendix: A Compendium of General C
- Page 87 and 88:
Chapter 8: Student Engagement Towar
- Page 89 and 90:
particular items. Indeed, a point o
- Page 91 and 92:
employing the SCEQ have shown other
- Page 93 and 94:
one of eight achievement emotions m
- Page 95 and 96:
Recent efforts (Saddler, Sonnert, H
- Page 97 and 98:
References References marked with a
- Page 99 and 100:
64, 847-860. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.
- Page 101 and 102:
*Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., Gon
- Page 103 and 104:
course. Pretest and posttest survey
- Page 105 and 106:
Perceptions 7 Problem-Solving 1 Sat
- Page 107 and 108:
Culture and Issues Knowledge of Cur
- Page 109 and 110:
Civic Attitudes and Skills Question
- Page 111 and 112:
Scale of Service-Learning Involveme
- Page 113 and 114:
engagement and psychological measur
- Page 115 and 116:
Giles, D. E., & Eyler, J. (2013). T
- Page 117 and 118:
Appendix A: Research Measures for M
- Page 119 and 120:
Robby, M.A. -CASQ -SAT/9 Scores -¹
- Page 121 and 122:
Steinberg, K. S., Hatcher, J. A., B
- Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 10: Measuring Individual Di
- Page 125 and 126:
either unnecessary or is referenced
- Page 127 and 128:
Park, 2005). The merit of the instr
- Page 129 and 130:
Similar factor structures were prod
- Page 131 and 132:
References References marked with a
- Page 133 and 134:
Chapter 11: Measuring Well-Being in
- Page 135 and 136:
items, and the PANAS 44 items, and
- Page 137 and 138:
Meaning in Life The Meaning in Life
- Page 139 and 140:
future,” using a 5-point scale (1
- Page 141 and 142:
Domain-Specific Stress and Anxiety
- Page 143 and 144:
demonstrate peoples' varying levels
- Page 145 and 146:
Gehlbach, H. (2015). Seven survey s
- Page 147 and 148:
Ritchie, R. A., Meca, A., Madrazo,
- Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 12: Assessing Professor-Stu
- Page 151 and 152:
ends with some unanswered questions
- Page 153 and 154:
positively about their professors
- Page 155 and 156:
The PSRS underwent further validati
- Page 157 and 158:
help or hinder the graduate student
- Page 159 and 160:
Komarraju, M. (2013). Ideal teacher
- Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 13: Effective Tools for Ass
- Page 163 and 164:
offer guidance based on their exper
- Page 165 and 166:
The Original TBC Study Our approach
- Page 167 and 168:
student/faculty rating with critica
- Page 169 and 170:
eveals that five qualities (knowled
- Page 171 and 172:
References References marked with a
- Page 173 and 174:
*Wann, P.D. (2001, January). Facult
- Page 175 and 176:
Nessie the Mythical Loch Ness Monst
- Page 177 and 178:
components of knowledge of cognitio
- Page 179 and 180:
a cognitive activity (Cacioppo et a
- Page 181 and 182:
teacher? In other words, how do we
- Page 183 and 184:
Christopher (2015) also suggests th
- Page 185 and 186:
Kirk, C., Busler, J., Keeley, J., &