20.10.2015 Views

A COMPENDIUM OF SCALES for use in the SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING AND LEARNING

compscalesstl

compscalesstl

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and boredom; whereas <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer <strong>in</strong>cludes more general measure (e.g., national survey of<br />

student engagement).<br />

Lori Simons systematically exam<strong>in</strong>es 21 quantitative measures of service learn<strong>in</strong>g and civic<br />

engagement <strong>in</strong> Chapter 9, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g measures of service impacts on community, faculty<br />

perceptions of service, and service impacts on students. Along with dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g between<br />

scales with and without psychometric evidence, Simons provides advice <strong>for</strong> educators<br />

<strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g civic engagement as a student learn<strong>in</strong>g outcome.<br />

Students’ epistemological beliefs are <strong>the</strong> focus of Chapter 10, written by Kelly Ku. By provid<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

<strong>the</strong>oretical background as well as common measures to assess how students conceptualize <strong>the</strong><br />

nature of knowledge, Ku addresses questions such as: Do students believe knowledge is relative<br />

and changeable or do <strong>the</strong>y view it <strong>in</strong> absolute terms? How do <strong>the</strong>y view <strong>the</strong> perspectives and<br />

op<strong>in</strong>ions or authorities and when are <strong>the</strong>y able to see ambiguity <strong>in</strong> knowledge representations?<br />

In Chapter 11, Krist<strong>in</strong> Layous, S. Ka<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>e Nelson, and Angela M. Legg propose that students’<br />

psychological well-be<strong>in</strong>g is an essential factor <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir experience <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

classroom. The authors provide an overview of scales that assess different aspects of wellbe<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g both positive (e.g., life satisfaction, subjective well-be<strong>in</strong>g, mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> life) and<br />

negative (e.g., general and doma<strong>in</strong>-specific stress and anxiety) aspects.<br />

Professor-student relationships are <strong>the</strong> focus of Chapter 12, contributed by Jenna Meyerberg<br />

and Angela M. Legg. These authors beg<strong>in</strong> by provid<strong>in</strong>g a conceptual framework <strong>for</strong><br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> positive impact on student outcomes of immediacy behaviors, professorstudent<br />

rapport, and <strong>the</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g alliance, be<strong>for</strong>e review<strong>in</strong>g measures of all three constructs.<br />

In Chapter 13, Claire Kirk, Jessica Busler, Jared Keeley, and William Buskist review several<br />

approaches to assess<strong>in</strong>g professor efficacy, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g by collect<strong>in</strong>g student and peer feedback<br />

and evaluat<strong>in</strong>g teach<strong>in</strong>g materials, be<strong>for</strong>e provid<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>-depth exam<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> Teacher<br />

Behaviors Checklist as an exemplar tool.<br />

The e-book concludes with a thoughtful (and <strong>in</strong> our m<strong>in</strong>ds humorous) chapter by Aaron<br />

Richmond, who highlights <strong>the</strong> types of scales <strong>the</strong> literature still needs (Chapter 14), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

measures of metacognition and learn<strong>in</strong>g strategies, scales to assess syllabi and model teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

characteristics, as well as valid behavioral measures to accompany <strong>the</strong> many self-report SoTL<br />

scales. Richmond concludes with a series of five recommendations that represent a call to<br />

action <strong>for</strong> SoTL research.<br />

By highlight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> most prom<strong>in</strong>ent scales on a range of topics, this e-book serves as an<br />

important reference guide with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scholarship of teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong><br />

practical advice that each expert author has provided will surely enhance <strong>the</strong> rigor of scholarly<br />

work to follow. We hope that this compendium provides a <strong>use</strong>ful tool <strong>for</strong> early career<br />

psychologist and seasoned researchers alike.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!