20.10.2015 Views

A COMPENDIUM OF SCALES for use in the SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING AND LEARNING

compscalesstl

compscalesstl

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Epistemological Questionnaire (EQ)<br />

The 62-item EQ (Schommer, 1990) is constructed based on Schommer’s five-facet model of<br />

epistemological beliefs. Four validation studies utiliz<strong>in</strong>g different population samples with<br />

different educational and work experiences were conducted; <strong>the</strong> reported <strong>in</strong>ternal consistency<br />

reliability ranged from .50s to .70s (Schommer, 1993; 1998). Group comparisons revealed<br />

sensitivity of <strong>the</strong> EQ to age, gender, educational level, and cultural differences. Adults and<br />

female students were more likely to believe <strong>in</strong> ability as acquired as opposed to predisposed<br />

(Schommer, 1993; 1998). Asian students were found to be extremely consistent <strong>in</strong> agree<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that authorities are not to be criticized as opposed to those of <strong>the</strong> West (Chan & Elliot, 2000).<br />

The EQ has reported a somewhat mixed factor structure despite its popularity. The proposed<br />

five-factor structure has not been consistently replicated <strong>in</strong> later studies (Braten & Stromso,<br />

2005; Clarebout, Elen, Luyten, & Bamps, 2001; Duell & Schommer-Aik<strong>in</strong>s 2001; Schraw,<br />

Bendixen, & Dunkle, 2002; Wood & Kardash, 2002). Researchers tend to conclude that <strong>the</strong> low<br />

to modest <strong>in</strong>ternal consistency might be ca<strong>use</strong>d by <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r ambiguous nature of <strong>the</strong><br />

construct of personal epistemology itself. Additionally, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>consistency of respondents’<br />

rat<strong>in</strong>gs of some items could reflect that respondents hold contrast<strong>in</strong>g beliefs that (e.g. <strong>the</strong> only<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g that is certa<strong>in</strong> is uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty itself) do not lend <strong>the</strong>mselves easily to empirical research<br />

(Qian & Alverman, 1995).<br />

Epistemological Belief Inventory (EBI)<br />

The EBI (Schraw et al., 2002) is a ref<strong>in</strong>ed version of <strong>the</strong> EQ <strong>in</strong> an attempt to enhance its<br />

psychometric properties. This is a shorter <strong>in</strong>strument with a more stable factor structure<br />

generat<strong>in</strong>g up to 60% of variance (Schraw et al., 2012). It consists of 32 items and yields five<br />

factors with reliabilities that typically range from .50 to .65.<br />

The orig<strong>in</strong>al 62-tiem EQ and <strong>the</strong> EBI are amongst <strong>the</strong> most popular multi-facet <strong>in</strong>struments of<br />

personal epistemology; however, both of <strong>the</strong>m are not free from measurement problems. Yet<br />

<strong>in</strong> comparison, <strong>the</strong> EBI is slightly more favorable as <strong>the</strong> authors have made an ef<strong>for</strong>t <strong>in</strong> this<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ed 32-item version to remove redundant items, and rephrase ambiguously worded items.<br />

Such ef<strong>for</strong>t lead to improved clarity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> comprehension of <strong>the</strong> items, an enhanced structural<br />

stability, as well as reliabilities set with<strong>in</strong> an acceptable range.<br />

Discipl<strong>in</strong>e-Foc<strong>use</strong>d Epistemological Beliefs Questionnaire (DFEBQ)<br />

The FEDBQ (Hofer, 2000) is a doma<strong>in</strong>-specific questionnaire with items similar to those of<br />

Schommer’s (1990) EQ. It conta<strong>in</strong>s 18 items, assess<strong>in</strong>g four factors correspond<strong>in</strong>g to Hofer’s<br />

revised model of epistemological beliefs, us<strong>in</strong>g a 7-po<strong>in</strong>t Likert scale. Respondents are asked to<br />

focus on a specific academic discipl<strong>in</strong>e (e.g., Science or Psychology) as <strong>the</strong>y rate each item.<br />

128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!