27.12.2015 Views

robert spencer-did muhammad exist__ an inquiry into islams obscure origins-intercollegiate studies institute (2012) (1)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

49 Nevo <strong>an</strong>d Koren, Crossroads to Islam, 214.<br />

50 Luxenberg, “Christmas in the Kor<strong>an</strong>.”<br />

51 Ibid.<br />

52 Ibid.<br />

53 Ibid.<br />

54 Reynolds, “Introduction,” 17.<br />

55 Luxenberg, “Christmas in the Kor<strong>an</strong>.”<br />

56 Ibid.<br />

57 Ibid.<br />

Chapter 9: Who Collected the Qur'<strong>an</strong>?<br />

1 Bukhari, Sahih al-Bukhari, vol. 6, book 66, no. 4987.<br />

2 Ibid., book 65, no. 4784.<br />

3 Powers, Muhammad Is Not the Father, 159.<br />

4 Muhammad ibn Jarir at-Tabari, The History of al-Tabari, vol. 17, “The First Civil War,” tr<strong>an</strong>s. G. R. Hawting (Alb<strong>an</strong>y: State University<br />

of New York Press, 1996), 29.<br />

5 Ibid., 34.<br />

6 Ibid., 37.<br />

7 Ibid., 78.<br />

8 Ibid., 79.<br />

9 Ibid., 79.<br />

10 Ibid., 81.<br />

11 Ibid., 82.<br />

12 Ibid., 85–86.<br />

13 See Small, Textual Criticism, 15–27, for useful summary descriptions of some of the principal early Qur'<strong>an</strong>ic m<strong>an</strong>uscripts.<br />

14 Lester, “What Is the Kor<strong>an</strong>?”<br />

15 Gilchrist, Jam' Al-Qur'<strong>an</strong>.<br />

16 Fr<strong>an</strong>çois Déroche, La tr<strong>an</strong>smission écrite du Cor<strong>an</strong> d<strong>an</strong>s les débuts de l'islam: Le codex Parisino-petropolit<strong>an</strong>us (Leiden: Brill,<br />

2009), is a fascinating study of <strong>an</strong> early Qur'<strong>an</strong>ic m<strong>an</strong>uscript, Bibliothèque nationale de Fr<strong>an</strong>ce (BNF) Arabe 328, which he combines with<br />

other m<strong>an</strong>uscripts that he establishes came from the same original, consisting of sections of suras 2 through 72. Déroche contends that this<br />

m<strong>an</strong>uscript, which does not contain most diacritical marks, dates from between 670 <strong>an</strong>d 720. The scholar Andrew Rippin, in reviewing<br />

Déroche's book, notes: “To Déroche, the evidence of the m<strong>an</strong>uscript suggests that the account of the ‘Uthm<strong>an</strong>ic collection <strong>an</strong>d production of a<br />

master set of m<strong>an</strong>uscripts to be distributed across the new empire simply c<strong>an</strong>not be historically accurate. The purported goal of ‘Uthm<strong>an</strong> could<br />

not have been accomplished, given the realities of the orthography available at the time; the vari<strong>an</strong>ts found in this copy of the text suggest that<br />

a unified text was also not achieved that early.” See Andrew Rippin's book review, “La Tr<strong>an</strong>smission écrite du Cor<strong>an</strong> d<strong>an</strong>s les débuts de<br />

l'islam: Le Codex Parisino-petropolit<strong>an</strong>us (Book review),” Journal of the Americ<strong>an</strong> Oriental Society 129:4 (2009), 706(3). See also Small,<br />

Textual Criticism, 21.<br />

17 Arthur Jeffery, “A Vari<strong>an</strong>t Text of the Fatiha,” in Ibn Warraq, The Origins of the Kor<strong>an</strong>, 145–46.<br />

18 Jeffery, “Vari<strong>an</strong>t Text,” 146–47.<br />

19 Ibn Warraq, Virgins?, 221.<br />

20 Ibid., 222.<br />

21 Ibid., 223.<br />

22 Ibid., 219.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!