Occupation
2016-bookofabstracts-300316
2016-bookofabstracts-300316
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Abstracts<br />
Posters<br />
develops participative art projects. Before, she worked in health<br />
research at University College London, King’s College London<br />
and Brunel University. A long time ago, she also held posts as a<br />
physiotherapist.<br />
Lucinda works for Bridges self-management since October<br />
2013 after being involved in delivering Bridges training for 4<br />
years. She develops and evaluates Bridges training programmes<br />
for health, social care and third sector workers in integrating<br />
self-management support into daily practice. Lucinda is also an<br />
honorary research fellow at the Faculty of Health, Social Care<br />
and Education at St George’s University of London. She has a<br />
Masters of Research in Clinical Practice and has worked as a<br />
neurological Physiotherapist in both the acute and community<br />
NHS settings.<br />
P71<br />
A pilot trial of compression gloves in early<br />
inflammatory and rheumatoid arthritis<br />
Hough Y 1 , Hammond A 2 , Prior Y 2 , Jacklin A 3 , Dooley M 4 ,<br />
Perkins J 5 ,Durkin C 6 , St Helens & Knowsley Teaching<br />
Hospitals 1 , Health Sciences Research Centre, University<br />
of Salford 2 , Stockport NHS Foundation Trust 3 , Southport<br />
& Ormskirk Hospital NHS Trust 4 , Central Manchester NHS<br />
Foundation Trust Trafford General Hospital 5 , East Lancs.<br />
Hospital Trust 6<br />
Background: Compression gloves are provided in rheumatoid<br />
arthritis (RA) to improve hand symptoms and function but<br />
there is little evidence for their effectiveness. As a group of<br />
Rheumatology <strong>Occupation</strong>al Therapists we were unaware of<br />
clinical evidence to support use of gloves. Financial constraints<br />
lead to the need to justify effective use of resources. No recent<br />
quality studies of compression gloves in arthritis were available a<br />
feasibility study to support anecdotal evidence was required. The<br />
study aim was to evaluate gloves’ effects on hand symptoms and<br />
function.<br />
Methods: Members of the northwest COTSSR met to agree<br />
best clinical practice. Service users were involved. A systematic<br />
review of compression gloves trials undertaken all Studies were<br />
small and poor methodology. The last study undertaken was<br />
21 years ago. The group agreed compression glove criteria,<br />
hand assessment, treatment protocols and patient information<br />
leaflet. Prior to recruitment the OTs attended a training day to<br />
standardize assessments and study procedures.<br />
A pre-post-test study was conducted. Participants wore Isotoner<br />
¾ finger gloves. Hand assessments were completed at 0 and 4<br />
weeks.<br />
Results: Outcomes demonstrated significant improvements in:<br />
pain, stiffness, swelling, finger flexion and hand function.<br />
Conclusion: Compression gloves improved hand symptoms and<br />
function. Lack of a control group means changes may not be<br />
due to glove-wear. A randomized controlled trial is required,<br />
including longer follow-up.<br />
References<br />
Braun, V, Clarke, V (2006) Using thematic analysisin psychology.<br />
Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2): 77–101<br />
Dixon AStJ (1986) Trial for Isotoner gloves for morning stiffness<br />
and pain in rheumatoid arthritis. British Journal of Clinical<br />
Practice 40 (7): 271–272<br />
Oostervelt FJG, Raskerr JJ (1990) The effect of pressure gradient<br />
and thermolactyl control gloves in arthritis patients with swollen<br />
hands. British Journal of Rheumatology 29:197–200<br />
Keywords<br />
Long term conditions, Research, Practice – present and future,<br />
NHS<br />
Contact E-mail Addresses<br />
yvonne.hough@sthk.nhs.uk<br />
Author Biographies<br />
Band 7 <strong>Occupation</strong>al therapist working within field of<br />
rheumatology. Part of a MDT commited to providing best<br />
practice to service users, commited to ensuring role of the OT<br />
embedded into service. Active member of the northwest COTSS.<br />
Professor Alison Hammond researcher Health Sciences Research<br />
Centre, University of Salford.<br />
P72<br />
Independent living centres, do they represent value<br />
for commissioners?<br />
Cambridge S, Deakin I, Devon County Council<br />
This submission will consider the rationale and evidence<br />
for commissioning an Independent Living Centre (ILC). The<br />
Community Equipment Service (CES) joint commissioners initially<br />
funded this service in 2004. The CES has 1500 prescribers and<br />
initially activities included: training clinicians in safe prescription,<br />
new product awareness workshops, evaluation of stock items,<br />
management of the web catalogue and a resource for the public<br />
regarding private equipment purchase.<br />
In 2011 the spend on equipment was unsustainable with a lack<br />
of effective authorisation and limited reissue of high cost nonstock<br />
items. For a 3 month trial period, commissioners funded<br />
an increase in ILC staffing and prescribers sent all requests for<br />
non-stock items to the ILC.<br />
The ILC reviewed the clinical reasoning, offered alternative<br />
solutions and searched returned stock for reissue. The trial<br />
evidenced significant savings and the additional staffing was<br />
made permanent. Savings now average £57,000/month.<br />
The ILC also now reviews and authorises spend against the<br />
Continuing Health Care (CHC) non-stock equipment budget.<br />
The cost to CHC is £283/month with average savings of £8,000/<br />
month.<br />
Commissioners also targeted prescriber spend and behaviour<br />
patterns against specific high volume items e.g. pressure<br />
cushions where the ILC analysis led to the delivery of training<br />
sessions in conjunction with expert tissue viability practitioners<br />
to raise awareness of alternative preventative clinical practice.<br />
This has reduced spend on these items by £8,000/month and<br />
improved outcomes for service users.<br />
Outcomes for commissioners: the total annual staffing cost of<br />
the ILC is £80,000 with actual savings of £74,000 achieved<br />
through prevention of spend using non-equipment solutions,<br />
maximising reissue of stock and targeted spend using less<br />
expensive alternative equipment.<br />
Outcomes for service users: Timely clinically effective solutions.<br />
References<br />
Department of Health (2014) Care Act, London: DH. www.<br />
legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014<br />
Keywords<br />
Managers, Service improvement or transformation, Leadership,<br />
Inter-agency<br />
Contact E-mail Addresses<br />
sarah.cambridge@devon.gov.uk<br />
102