04.06.2016 Views

Occupation

2016-bookofabstracts-300316

2016-bookofabstracts-300316

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abstracts<br />

Anna Smith is a Band 5 occupational therapist working in a<br />

rotational post at Nottingham University Hospitals Trust. She<br />

graduated from University of Derby this year and is currently on<br />

her first rotation in elective orthopaedics.<br />

P142<br />

What did they learn? A 5 year review of preregistration<br />

group skills training<br />

Maris-Shaw S, London South Bank University<br />

Group skills training has been a foundation of the LSBU<br />

occupational therapy curriculum since 2000. It supports the<br />

HCPC (2013) proficiency standards 9.8 and 9.9, that stress the<br />

importance of understanding and working within groups and<br />

managing the dynamics of these situations to aid learning and<br />

change. The students participate in group training over a 4 day<br />

period, delivering a student-led group to their peers and receive<br />

feedback related to their facilitation skills. At the end of their<br />

final day a questionnaire is used to evaluate their experience<br />

and gain feedback to establish whether these skills enable<br />

them to achieve a level of competence in readiness for their<br />

future practice as occupational therapists. The findings from<br />

this questionnaire conclusively support students have increased<br />

their learning in relation to group facilitation skills (Cole 2012),<br />

awareness of therapeutic use of self (Nicholls et al 2013) and<br />

improved their skills in planning, co-ordination and engaging<br />

others in a meaningful occupation. Verbal feedback revealed<br />

despite struggling initially, with some of the group concepts,<br />

students were able to reflect and valued the wider learning skills<br />

set they developed with regard to interpersonal skills. The impact<br />

of this training led students to feel more confident to engage<br />

with service users, carers and other agencies. This was due to<br />

a heightened understanding of the importance of delivering<br />

meaningful occupation through a thoughtful consideration of<br />

the dynamic processes in play within all interactions (Yalom<br />

2005).<br />

References<br />

Cole, M. B. (2012) Group Dynamics in <strong>Occupation</strong>al Therapy:<br />

the basis and practice application of group treatment 4th ed.<br />

Thorofare: Slack<br />

Health and Care Professions Council (2013) Standards of<br />

proficiency – <strong>Occupation</strong>al therapists. London: Health and Care<br />

Professions Council<br />

Nicholls, N, Cunningham Piergrossi, J Gibertoni, C, Daniel (2013)<br />

Psychoanalytic Thinking in <strong>Occupation</strong>al Therapy. W. Sussex:<br />

Wiley-Blackwell<br />

Yalom, I Leszcz, M (2005) Theory and Practice of Group<br />

Psychotherapy 5th ed. New York: Basic Books<br />

Keywords<br />

<strong>Occupation</strong>al therapists, Practice development, Education and<br />

learning, Education<br />

Contact E-mail Addresses<br />

sarah.maris-shaw@lsbu.ac.uk<br />

Author Biographies<br />

Sarah qualified as an occupational therapist in 1986. She has<br />

worked in a variety of mental health settings and has a particular<br />

interest in the importance of the therapeutic relationship. She<br />

currently works as an occupational therapist in a parental mental<br />

health team in Southwark, South London and Maudsley NHS<br />

Foundation trust and as a Senior Lecturer at London South Bank<br />

University.<br />

P143<br />

Care Act: can technology assist occupational<br />

therapists with the personalisation agenda?<br />

Posters<br />

Webb J, Harrison D, University of Salford<br />

Background: Manual handling and personalisation is intrinsic to<br />

occupational therapy assessment and intervention (COT, 2011<br />

The Care Act, 2014). The Care Act (2014) creates new duties for<br />

local authorities and their partners, driving personalisation as a<br />

core value giving people maximum control over how their needs<br />

are met. There is a need for therapists to have an increasing<br />

knowledge and skills base around moving and handling methods<br />

and equipment considering that one size does not fit all.<br />

The vast range of equipment and techniques can be<br />

overwhelming for a busy therapist. Scoping alternative options<br />

to meet an individual’s needs is time consuming and often<br />

flawed with limited solutions identified. Electronic learning is<br />

the use of information and communication technologies such as<br />

interactive web-services as tools to support the learning process,<br />

allowing learners to access more diversified learning experiences<br />

without the limitations of time, space, and place (Chen, 2011p.<br />

1501).<br />

Is access to a 24 hour online resource offering detailed, up<br />

to date professional support on a range of manual handling<br />

techniques and equipment the answer to meeting the<br />

personalisation agenda?<br />

Methods: This poster will explore the implications of the Care<br />

Act (2014) making clear links to research findings from The<br />

University of Salford investigating the impact of a web based<br />

moving and handling system on skill acquisition when compared<br />

with traditional manual handling training.<br />

Conclusion: The poster will present the findings of the research<br />

with Undergraduate occupational therapy students, outlining<br />

the value of how different learning styles and use of technology<br />

can improve clinical skills and knowledge of equipment available,<br />

whilst promoting enablement, patient safety, and harm free care<br />

with service users.<br />

References<br />

Chen,J.L. (2011) The effects of education compatibility and<br />

technological expectancy on e-learning acceptance. Computers<br />

&Education, 57, 1501–1511.<br />

College of <strong>Occupation</strong>al Therapists (2011) Manual handling –<br />

Guidance 3. London: College of <strong>Occupation</strong>al Therapists Ltd.<br />

The Care Act (2014) Available at: https://www.gov.uk/<br />

government/publications/care-act-2014-part-1-factsheets<br />

(Accessed: 11 August 2015).<br />

Keywords<br />

<strong>Occupation</strong>al therapists, Service improvement or transformation,<br />

Innovative practice, Education<br />

Contact E-mail Addresses<br />

j.webb@salford.ac.uk<br />

Author Biographies<br />

Jo-Anne Webb, MSc, PGCAP, Dip COT ROT, FHEA qualified<br />

as an occupational therapist in 1996, gaining her MSc in<br />

Health Practice in 2002. Prior to moving into education, Jo<br />

has significant experience in physical disability with clinical<br />

specialisms in orthopaedics and rheumatology, splinting, the role<br />

of the O.T. in continence, moving and handling and community<br />

rehabilitation. Jo’s most recent research projects have included<br />

moving and handling, tissue viability and single handed care.<br />

Deborah Harrison, RGN, PGCPMH, Dip S.M. initially qualified as<br />

a nurse in 1987, working across the NHS and social services in<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!