Occupation
2016-bookofabstracts-300316
2016-bookofabstracts-300316
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Abstracts Thursday 30th June 2016<br />
Thompson, S., and Kent, J. (2014). Healthy built environments<br />
supporting everyday occupations: Current thinking in urban<br />
planning. Journal of <strong>Occupation</strong>al Science, 21(1), pp.25–41.<br />
Keywords<br />
<strong>Occupation</strong>al therapists, Research, <strong>Occupation</strong>al science<br />
Contact E-mail Addresses<br />
a.payne@derby.ac.uk<br />
Author Biographies<br />
I am a Senior Lecturer in <strong>Occupation</strong>al Therapy at the<br />
University of Derby with a current expertise in communities<br />
and occupation. I have just completed my MSc in <strong>Occupation</strong>al<br />
Science at Leeds Beckett University.<br />
Session 54.1<br />
Service user/carer education in neuroplastic<br />
processes: implications for use in practice<br />
Zurich L, Sheffield Hallam University<br />
Introduction: The process of neuroplasticity is essential for<br />
functional recovery following an acquired brain injury (ABI)<br />
(Raskin 2011). Hourly rehabilitation sessions alone are often<br />
not enough to lead to neuroplastic changes in the brain.<br />
To maximise recovery following an ABI, service users must<br />
practice activities outside of these sessions (Johansson 2011),<br />
although the engagement and commitment required to<br />
create positive neuroplastic changes during rehab is often<br />
insufficient. In concordance with the national clinical guidelines<br />
for professionals working in ABI rehabilitation, educational<br />
intervention should be a part of routine practice. However, there<br />
are no specific UK guidelines, standard clinical practice or current<br />
research around educating service users or carers in neuroplastic<br />
processes to provide understanding of their ABI and optimise<br />
their recovery chances.<br />
The aim of this study is to explore how, if and why occupational<br />
therapists choose to discuss neuroplastic processes during the<br />
rehabilitation process with service users with an ABI and their<br />
carers. The study explores current practice, methods utilised<br />
and examines viewpoints around such a provision to detail its<br />
relevancy to neuro occupational therapy.<br />
Methods: The study employed a positivist and post positivist<br />
approach utilising an online survey that elicited mixed-methods<br />
data. A purposive sample of UK occupational therapists<br />
who work with people with an ABI were recruited through<br />
the College of <strong>Occupation</strong>al Therapists Specialist Section<br />
Neurological Practice and third-sector and private brain injury<br />
organisations. The data will be analysed using both SPSS and<br />
thematic analysis.<br />
Results: Initial findings confirm the overarching necessity for<br />
standardising this educational provision. It is expected that the<br />
results may help steer neuro care pathways and guide future<br />
practice in OT providing significant implications for rehab<br />
outcomes for the service user.<br />
References<br />
Johansson BB, (2011) Current Trends in Stroke Rehabilitation.<br />
A Review with focus on Brain Plasticity. Acta Neurologica<br />
Scandinavica, 123(3), 147–159.<br />
Raskin SA, (2011) Neuroplasticity and rehabilitation. New York:<br />
Guilford Press.<br />
Keywords<br />
Neurological practice, Research, Pathways or models of service<br />
delivery, Practice – present and future<br />
Contact E-mail Addresses<br />
lucindazurich@gmail.com<br />
Author Biographies<br />
Lucy Zurich is an MSc <strong>Occupation</strong>al Therapy student due to<br />
qualify from Sheffield Hallam University in April 2016. She has<br />
a BSc Hons degree Psychology and has worked in education<br />
for several years. Lucy has a special interest in neuro OT and a<br />
passion for ABI rehabilitation.<br />
Session 54.2<br />
What are the experiences of stroke survivors with<br />
managing eating in the long-term?<br />
Jones N 1,2 , Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 1 ,<br />
University of Sheffield 2<br />
Background and aim: There are 1.2 million stroke survivors in<br />
the UK (Stroke Association 2015). Stroke affects activities of<br />
daily living such as eating. Little is known about how people<br />
cope with eating difficulties in the long-term (Perry & McLaren<br />
2003). The purpose of this research is to explore the complex<br />
phenomenon of eating difficulties six months post stroke.<br />
Methods: A Focus group (Krueger & Casey 2000) and<br />
participatory design methods (Mattelmäki 2005) were used with<br />
a purposive sample of 7 English stroke support group members.<br />
Key themes associated with the eating experience were<br />
identified using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke 2013).<br />
Results: A spectrum of eating experiences was identified. Barriers<br />
to managing eating include social, environmental, and emotional<br />
issues. Recognizing self in doing and sustaining activities<br />
despite impairment was important for well-being. Participants<br />
demonstrated resilience and resourcefulness. The use of assistive<br />
devices elicited a sense of mastery, achievement and improved<br />
occupational performance.<br />
Conclusions: Eating after stroke is a complex multi-faceted<br />
phenomenon. Stroke survivors sought opportunities to<br />
participate in occupations that revolved around eating. Eating<br />
activities were used for rehabilitation and to self-monitor<br />
recovery and rehabilitation. This research found a link between<br />
participation in eating activities and a sense of mastery.<br />
Participatory research methods are a useful to OT’s because they<br />
explore real life experiences, in real life contexts.<br />
Implications for OT and services users: OTs are well placed to<br />
address the barriers to using assistive eating devices. This study<br />
informs OT practice about how people living with stroke strive<br />
to adapt to eating difficulties, fostering innovative thinking and<br />
problem solving. It inspires future OT research into assistive<br />
eating devices and describes how participatory research methods<br />
are a useful to OT research.<br />
References<br />
Braun, V. & Clarke, V., 2013. Successful Qualitative Research<br />
First. M. Carmichael, ed., London: Sages publications Ltd.<br />
Krueger, R. & Casey, M.A., 2000. Focus Groups 3rd Edition: A<br />
Practical Guide For Applied Research 3rd ed., Sage Publications,<br />
inc.<br />
Mattelmäki, T., 2005. Applying probes – from inspirational notes<br />
to collaborative insights. CoDesign, 1(2), pp.83#8211102.<br />
Perry, L. & McLaren, S., 2003. Coping and adaptation<br />
at six months after stroke: Experiences with eating<br />
disabilities. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40(2),<br />
pp.185#8211195.<br />
42