04.06.2016 Views

Occupation

2016-bookofabstracts-300316

2016-bookofabstracts-300316

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abstracts Thursday 30th June 2016<br />

Thompson, S., and Kent, J. (2014). Healthy built environments<br />

supporting everyday occupations: Current thinking in urban<br />

planning. Journal of <strong>Occupation</strong>al Science, 21(1), pp.25–41.<br />

Keywords<br />

<strong>Occupation</strong>al therapists, Research, <strong>Occupation</strong>al science<br />

Contact E-mail Addresses<br />

a.payne@derby.ac.uk<br />

Author Biographies<br />

I am a Senior Lecturer in <strong>Occupation</strong>al Therapy at the<br />

University of Derby with a current expertise in communities<br />

and occupation. I have just completed my MSc in <strong>Occupation</strong>al<br />

Science at Leeds Beckett University.<br />

Session 54.1<br />

Service user/carer education in neuroplastic<br />

processes: implications for use in practice<br />

Zurich L, Sheffield Hallam University<br />

Introduction: The process of neuroplasticity is essential for<br />

functional recovery following an acquired brain injury (ABI)<br />

(Raskin 2011). Hourly rehabilitation sessions alone are often<br />

not enough to lead to neuroplastic changes in the brain.<br />

To maximise recovery following an ABI, service users must<br />

practice activities outside of these sessions (Johansson 2011),<br />

although the engagement and commitment required to<br />

create positive neuroplastic changes during rehab is often<br />

insufficient. In concordance with the national clinical guidelines<br />

for professionals working in ABI rehabilitation, educational<br />

intervention should be a part of routine practice. However, there<br />

are no specific UK guidelines, standard clinical practice or current<br />

research around educating service users or carers in neuroplastic<br />

processes to provide understanding of their ABI and optimise<br />

their recovery chances.<br />

The aim of this study is to explore how, if and why occupational<br />

therapists choose to discuss neuroplastic processes during the<br />

rehabilitation process with service users with an ABI and their<br />

carers. The study explores current practice, methods utilised<br />

and examines viewpoints around such a provision to detail its<br />

relevancy to neuro occupational therapy.<br />

Methods: The study employed a positivist and post positivist<br />

approach utilising an online survey that elicited mixed-methods<br />

data. A purposive sample of UK occupational therapists<br />

who work with people with an ABI were recruited through<br />

the College of <strong>Occupation</strong>al Therapists Specialist Section<br />

Neurological Practice and third-sector and private brain injury<br />

organisations. The data will be analysed using both SPSS and<br />

thematic analysis.<br />

Results: Initial findings confirm the overarching necessity for<br />

standardising this educational provision. It is expected that the<br />

results may help steer neuro care pathways and guide future<br />

practice in OT providing significant implications for rehab<br />

outcomes for the service user.<br />

References<br />

Johansson BB, (2011) Current Trends in Stroke Rehabilitation.<br />

A Review with focus on Brain Plasticity. Acta Neurologica<br />

Scandinavica, 123(3), 147–159.<br />

Raskin SA, (2011) Neuroplasticity and rehabilitation. New York:<br />

Guilford Press.<br />

Keywords<br />

Neurological practice, Research, Pathways or models of service<br />

delivery, Practice – present and future<br />

Contact E-mail Addresses<br />

lucindazurich@gmail.com<br />

Author Biographies<br />

Lucy Zurich is an MSc <strong>Occupation</strong>al Therapy student due to<br />

qualify from Sheffield Hallam University in April 2016. She has<br />

a BSc Hons degree Psychology and has worked in education<br />

for several years. Lucy has a special interest in neuro OT and a<br />

passion for ABI rehabilitation.<br />

Session 54.2<br />

What are the experiences of stroke survivors with<br />

managing eating in the long-term?<br />

Jones N 1,2 , Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 1 ,<br />

University of Sheffield 2<br />

Background and aim: There are 1.2 million stroke survivors in<br />

the UK (Stroke Association 2015). Stroke affects activities of<br />

daily living such as eating. Little is known about how people<br />

cope with eating difficulties in the long-term (Perry & McLaren<br />

2003). The purpose of this research is to explore the complex<br />

phenomenon of eating difficulties six months post stroke.<br />

Methods: A Focus group (Krueger & Casey 2000) and<br />

participatory design methods (Mattelmäki 2005) were used with<br />

a purposive sample of 7 English stroke support group members.<br />

Key themes associated with the eating experience were<br />

identified using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke 2013).<br />

Results: A spectrum of eating experiences was identified. Barriers<br />

to managing eating include social, environmental, and emotional<br />

issues. Recognizing self in doing and sustaining activities<br />

despite impairment was important for well-being. Participants<br />

demonstrated resilience and resourcefulness. The use of assistive<br />

devices elicited a sense of mastery, achievement and improved<br />

occupational performance.<br />

Conclusions: Eating after stroke is a complex multi-faceted<br />

phenomenon. Stroke survivors sought opportunities to<br />

participate in occupations that revolved around eating. Eating<br />

activities were used for rehabilitation and to self-monitor<br />

recovery and rehabilitation. This research found a link between<br />

participation in eating activities and a sense of mastery.<br />

Participatory research methods are a useful to OT’s because they<br />

explore real life experiences, in real life contexts.<br />

Implications for OT and services users: OTs are well placed to<br />

address the barriers to using assistive eating devices. This study<br />

informs OT practice about how people living with stroke strive<br />

to adapt to eating difficulties, fostering innovative thinking and<br />

problem solving. It inspires future OT research into assistive<br />

eating devices and describes how participatory research methods<br />

are a useful to OT research.<br />

References<br />

Braun, V. & Clarke, V., 2013. Successful Qualitative Research<br />

First. M. Carmichael, ed., London: Sages publications Ltd.<br />

Krueger, R. & Casey, M.A., 2000. Focus Groups 3rd Edition: A<br />

Practical Guide For Applied Research 3rd ed., Sage Publications,<br />

inc.<br />

Mattelmäki, T., 2005. Applying probes – from inspirational notes<br />

to collaborative insights. CoDesign, 1(2), pp.83#8211102.<br />

Perry, L. & McLaren, S., 2003. Coping and adaptation<br />

at six months after stroke: Experiences with eating<br />

disabilities. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40(2),<br />

pp.185#8211195.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!