01.07.2016 Views

A FUTURE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE TELEVISION CONTENT AND PLATFORMS IN A DIGITAL WORLD

FOTV-Report-Online-SP

FOTV-Report-Online-SP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CONTENT</strong> <strong>AND</strong> PLAT<strong>FOR</strong>MS <strong>IN</strong> A <strong>DIGITAL</strong> <strong>WORLD</strong><br />

The announcement by the BBC to locate<br />

several departments in Birmingham, including<br />

its centre of excellence for skills, recruitment<br />

and talent development, Diversity Unit and<br />

HR functions is very welcome and, in part,<br />

a response to the energetic campaign run<br />

in the city to secure improved broadcast<br />

representation.<br />

The BBC’s agreement to move its online<br />

channel, BBC Three, to Birmingham by<br />

2018 is more evidence of a willingness to<br />

reflect demands for greater investment<br />

in infrastructure outside of London. We<br />

would also strongly recommend that, given<br />

its statutory remit to reflect the cultural<br />

diversity of the UK, Channel 4 continues to<br />

think seriously about moving at least some<br />

of its operations from SW1 to Birmingham or<br />

another currently under-represented area,<br />

and that it strengthens its nations and regions<br />

office in Glasgow.<br />

We believe that it may be worth revisiting<br />

the BBC’s local television proposal that was<br />

ultimately rejected by the BBC Trust in 2008,<br />

following heavy lobbying by the newspaper<br />

industry, on the grounds that its public value<br />

was not sufficient then to offset market<br />

impact concerns. 386 In a revised form, such<br />

a proposal – creating partnerships between<br />

the BBC and local news organizations, both<br />

commercial and not-for-profit, as has been<br />

raised in the government’s white paper 387<br />

– might help to address the immense local<br />

democratic deficit in English regions. The<br />

existing commercial Local TV model, as we<br />

have already discussed elsewhere, has not<br />

been able to find the necessary investment<br />

for in-depth local news and a creative use<br />

of the BBC’s infrastructure would galvanise<br />

television at a local level.<br />

We are not arguing that these devolutionary<br />

changes should be at the expense of core<br />

PSB services for the UK where demand<br />

remains strong across the nations and<br />

regions. Indeed, some of the highest viewing<br />

figures for network content are in Wales;<br />

that fact does not preclude the need, at<br />

the same time, for more Welsh content. As<br />

John McCormick of the Royal Society of<br />

Edinburgh put it in relation to Scotland, “it’s<br />

important to find a way of articulating the<br />

need for adequate Scottish public service<br />

broadcasting without losing sight of the value<br />

of existing provision from London, from which<br />

we all benefit enormously. And the desirability<br />

of not harming it.” 388 Our point is that public<br />

service television – and this is not restricted<br />

to the BBC alone – will be strengthened if<br />

it is restructured on a more democratic and<br />

accountable basis that recognises both the<br />

demand for UK-wide content as well as a<br />

growing appetite for output that fits the<br />

changing political configuration of the UK in<br />

the 21st century.<br />

386<br />

BBC Trust, ‘BBC Trust rejects local video proposals’, November 21, 2008.<br />

387<br />

BBC white paper, 2016, p. 73.<br />

388<br />

Comments at Inquiry event, Royal Society of Edinburgh, April 16, 2016.<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!