A FUTURE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE TELEVISION CONTENT AND PLATFORMS IN A DIGITAL WORLD
FOTV-Report-Online-SP
FOTV-Report-Online-SP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>CONTENT</strong> <strong>AND</strong> PLAT<strong>FOR</strong>MS <strong>IN</strong> A <strong>DIGITAL</strong> <strong>WORLD</strong><br />
The announcement by the BBC to locate<br />
several departments in Birmingham, including<br />
its centre of excellence for skills, recruitment<br />
and talent development, Diversity Unit and<br />
HR functions is very welcome and, in part,<br />
a response to the energetic campaign run<br />
in the city to secure improved broadcast<br />
representation.<br />
The BBC’s agreement to move its online<br />
channel, BBC Three, to Birmingham by<br />
2018 is more evidence of a willingness to<br />
reflect demands for greater investment<br />
in infrastructure outside of London. We<br />
would also strongly recommend that, given<br />
its statutory remit to reflect the cultural<br />
diversity of the UK, Channel 4 continues to<br />
think seriously about moving at least some<br />
of its operations from SW1 to Birmingham or<br />
another currently under-represented area,<br />
and that it strengthens its nations and regions<br />
office in Glasgow.<br />
We believe that it may be worth revisiting<br />
the BBC’s local television proposal that was<br />
ultimately rejected by the BBC Trust in 2008,<br />
following heavy lobbying by the newspaper<br />
industry, on the grounds that its public value<br />
was not sufficient then to offset market<br />
impact concerns. 386 In a revised form, such<br />
a proposal – creating partnerships between<br />
the BBC and local news organizations, both<br />
commercial and not-for-profit, as has been<br />
raised in the government’s white paper 387<br />
– might help to address the immense local<br />
democratic deficit in English regions. The<br />
existing commercial Local TV model, as we<br />
have already discussed elsewhere, has not<br />
been able to find the necessary investment<br />
for in-depth local news and a creative use<br />
of the BBC’s infrastructure would galvanise<br />
television at a local level.<br />
We are not arguing that these devolutionary<br />
changes should be at the expense of core<br />
PSB services for the UK where demand<br />
remains strong across the nations and<br />
regions. Indeed, some of the highest viewing<br />
figures for network content are in Wales;<br />
that fact does not preclude the need, at<br />
the same time, for more Welsh content. As<br />
John McCormick of the Royal Society of<br />
Edinburgh put it in relation to Scotland, “it’s<br />
important to find a way of articulating the<br />
need for adequate Scottish public service<br />
broadcasting without losing sight of the value<br />
of existing provision from London, from which<br />
we all benefit enormously. And the desirability<br />
of not harming it.” 388 Our point is that public<br />
service television – and this is not restricted<br />
to the BBC alone – will be strengthened if<br />
it is restructured on a more democratic and<br />
accountable basis that recognises both the<br />
demand for UK-wide content as well as a<br />
growing appetite for output that fits the<br />
changing political configuration of the UK in<br />
the 21st century.<br />
386<br />
BBC Trust, ‘BBC Trust rejects local video proposals’, November 21, 2008.<br />
387<br />
BBC white paper, 2016, p. 73.<br />
388<br />
Comments at Inquiry event, Royal Society of Edinburgh, April 16, 2016.<br />
127