A FUTURE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE TELEVISION CONTENT AND PLATFORMS IN A DIGITAL WORLD
FOTV-Report-Online-SP
FOTV-Report-Online-SP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A <strong>FUTURE</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>PUBLIC</strong> <strong>SERVICE</strong> <strong>TELEVISION</strong><br />
the means of production as people who did<br />
not ordinarily see themselves on television…<br />
would be given an opportunity to make<br />
programmes and have their experience<br />
represented on national television. It was<br />
quite revolutionary in broadcast terms.” Why,<br />
she reflected, “did no one else apart from<br />
Channel 4 trust us to do this?” 167<br />
Channel 4’s original constitutional<br />
arrangements and funding model also gave<br />
it the space to be inventive and different.<br />
Operating as a subsidiary of the broadcasting<br />
regulator, it was funded by the ITV network,<br />
which paid it a subscription in return for<br />
selling its advertising. This arrangement<br />
liberated Channel 4 from the demands of<br />
commercial competition and allowed it huge<br />
creative freedom.<br />
It was inevitable that some of the<br />
experimentalism and risk of the early,<br />
freewheeling days would dissipate after<br />
1993, when Channel 4 became commercially<br />
independent as a public corporation that<br />
sold its own advertising. 168 It had to operate<br />
in an increasingly competitive marketplace<br />
as the multichannel landscape started to<br />
take shape. This was always going to put<br />
a strain on the programming mix, and to<br />
be likely to take it in a more commercial<br />
direction. In the 1990s it came to depend on<br />
US drama imports and Brookside 169 ; in the<br />
2000s, leisure-based factual programming<br />
dominated the schedules. Channel 4 became<br />
hugely dependent on the revenue generated<br />
by the reality show Big Brother, a programme<br />
that became a liability after the Celebrity<br />
Big Brother racism row in 2007. 170 Since<br />
Big Brother ended in 2010, Channel 4 has<br />
achieved a better balance in the schedule,<br />
although the main channel’s ratings have<br />
fallen. 171<br />
Channel 4’s more commercially focused<br />
programming has allowed it to make the<br />
programmes that more obviously fulfil its<br />
remit, as well as to meet the terms of its<br />
main channel’s licence, under which it is<br />
required to produce a certain amount of<br />
news and current affairs programmes and<br />
satisfy various production quotas in return<br />
for its prominent position on the electronic<br />
programme guide (EPG). 172 Meanwhile, the<br />
remit has evolved since the channel was<br />
founded. The obligation to cater for tastes<br />
and minority interests not served by ITV was<br />
dropped following the 2003 Communications<br />
Act. 173 Instead, the act stated that Channel<br />
4 must provide a range of “high quality<br />
and diverse” programming, with output<br />
demonstrating innovation, experiment and<br />
creativity; appeal to a culturally diverse<br />
society; contribute to education; and exhibit a<br />
distinctive character. 174 It was given additional<br />
new media responsibilities, including<br />
appealing to the tastes and interests of older<br />
children and young adults, in the 2010 Digital<br />
Economy Act. 175<br />
167<br />
Margo Harkin, comments to Inquiry event in Coleraine, April 4, 2016.<br />
168<br />
For five years after that, it continued to be linked to ITV: it had to pay ITV a portion of its advertising revenues in return for ITV providing it with a<br />
safety net should it fall into deficit, an arrangement that proved very favourable to ITV.<br />
169<br />
US sitcoms and dramas, films (mostly of US origin), and Brookside between them accounted for half of viewing in 1997. Brown, A Licence to Be<br />
Different, p. 207.<br />
170<br />
Brown, A Licence to Be Different, pp. 1-9.<br />
171<br />
From 6.1% of the audience in 2010 to 4.8% in 2014. See Ofcom, Communications Market Report 2015, 2015, figure 2.59, p. 201.<br />
172<br />
Channel 4 is required to broadcast 208 hours per year or 4 hours per week of news (all in peak), and 208 hours per year or 4 hours per week of<br />
current affairs (80 in peak), while 56% of programmes (70% in peak) should be originally produced or commissioned, 35% of hours and expenditure<br />
should be devoted to programmes made outside the M25, with an additional requirement for 3% of programmes to be made outside England, rising<br />
to 9% from 2020. See the licence on the Ofcom website.<br />
173<br />
Brown, A Licence to Be Different, p. 275.<br />
174<br />
Communications Act 2003, section 265.<br />
175<br />
Digital Economy Act 2010, section 22.<br />
68