01.07.2016 Views

A FUTURE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE TELEVISION CONTENT AND PLATFORMS IN A DIGITAL WORLD

FOTV-Report-Online-SP

FOTV-Report-Online-SP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <strong>FUTURE</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>PUBLIC</strong> <strong>SERVICE</strong> <strong>TELEVISION</strong><br />

the means of production as people who did<br />

not ordinarily see themselves on television…<br />

would be given an opportunity to make<br />

programmes and have their experience<br />

represented on national television. It was<br />

quite revolutionary in broadcast terms.” Why,<br />

she reflected, “did no one else apart from<br />

Channel 4 trust us to do this?” 167<br />

Channel 4’s original constitutional<br />

arrangements and funding model also gave<br />

it the space to be inventive and different.<br />

Operating as a subsidiary of the broadcasting<br />

regulator, it was funded by the ITV network,<br />

which paid it a subscription in return for<br />

selling its advertising. This arrangement<br />

liberated Channel 4 from the demands of<br />

commercial competition and allowed it huge<br />

creative freedom.<br />

It was inevitable that some of the<br />

experimentalism and risk of the early,<br />

freewheeling days would dissipate after<br />

1993, when Channel 4 became commercially<br />

independent as a public corporation that<br />

sold its own advertising. 168 It had to operate<br />

in an increasingly competitive marketplace<br />

as the multichannel landscape started to<br />

take shape. This was always going to put<br />

a strain on the programming mix, and to<br />

be likely to take it in a more commercial<br />

direction. In the 1990s it came to depend on<br />

US drama imports and Brookside 169 ; in the<br />

2000s, leisure-based factual programming<br />

dominated the schedules. Channel 4 became<br />

hugely dependent on the revenue generated<br />

by the reality show Big Brother, a programme<br />

that became a liability after the Celebrity<br />

Big Brother racism row in 2007. 170 Since<br />

Big Brother ended in 2010, Channel 4 has<br />

achieved a better balance in the schedule,<br />

although the main channel’s ratings have<br />

fallen. 171<br />

Channel 4’s more commercially focused<br />

programming has allowed it to make the<br />

programmes that more obviously fulfil its<br />

remit, as well as to meet the terms of its<br />

main channel’s licence, under which it is<br />

required to produce a certain amount of<br />

news and current affairs programmes and<br />

satisfy various production quotas in return<br />

for its prominent position on the electronic<br />

programme guide (EPG). 172 Meanwhile, the<br />

remit has evolved since the channel was<br />

founded. The obligation to cater for tastes<br />

and minority interests not served by ITV was<br />

dropped following the 2003 Communications<br />

Act. 173 Instead, the act stated that Channel<br />

4 must provide a range of “high quality<br />

and diverse” programming, with output<br />

demonstrating innovation, experiment and<br />

creativity; appeal to a culturally diverse<br />

society; contribute to education; and exhibit a<br />

distinctive character. 174 It was given additional<br />

new media responsibilities, including<br />

appealing to the tastes and interests of older<br />

children and young adults, in the 2010 Digital<br />

Economy Act. 175<br />

167<br />

Margo Harkin, comments to Inquiry event in Coleraine, April 4, 2016.<br />

168<br />

For five years after that, it continued to be linked to ITV: it had to pay ITV a portion of its advertising revenues in return for ITV providing it with a<br />

safety net should it fall into deficit, an arrangement that proved very favourable to ITV.<br />

169<br />

US sitcoms and dramas, films (mostly of US origin), and Brookside between them accounted for half of viewing in 1997. Brown, A Licence to Be<br />

Different, p. 207.<br />

170<br />

Brown, A Licence to Be Different, pp. 1-9.<br />

171<br />

From 6.1% of the audience in 2010 to 4.8% in 2014. See Ofcom, Communications Market Report 2015, 2015, figure 2.59, p. 201.<br />

172<br />

Channel 4 is required to broadcast 208 hours per year or 4 hours per week of news (all in peak), and 208 hours per year or 4 hours per week of<br />

current affairs (80 in peak), while 56% of programmes (70% in peak) should be originally produced or commissioned, 35% of hours and expenditure<br />

should be devoted to programmes made outside the M25, with an additional requirement for 3% of programmes to be made outside England, rising<br />

to 9% from 2020. See the licence on the Ofcom website.<br />

173<br />

Brown, A Licence to Be Different, p. 275.<br />

174<br />

Communications Act 2003, section 265.<br />

175<br />

Digital Economy Act 2010, section 22.<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!