A FUTURE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE TELEVISION CONTENT AND PLATFORMS IN A DIGITAL WORLD
FOTV-Report-Online-SP
FOTV-Report-Online-SP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>CONTENT</strong> <strong>AND</strong> PLAT<strong>FOR</strong>MS <strong>IN</strong> A <strong>DIGITAL</strong> <strong>WORLD</strong><br />
Channel 5’s owner Viacom says it wants the<br />
channel to remain part of the UK’s public<br />
service broadcasting system. In its submission<br />
to us, it pointed out that Channel 5 exceeds<br />
its commitment to original programming<br />
and in fact makes a voluntary commitment<br />
to children’s programming, with an early<br />
morning strand of mostly animated content<br />
aimed at young children. 248<br />
However, Channel 5 is not widely<br />
acknowledged for its contribution to<br />
public service television. Indeed, Ofcomcommissioned<br />
research reported:<br />
“Participants of all ages expressed some<br />
surprise that Channel 5 had public service<br />
obligations.” 249 We can see why viewers felt<br />
that way. Channel Five’s schedule is best<br />
known for US dramas, Australian soaps and<br />
Big Brother, with a lot of documentaries<br />
about the benefits system (although we note<br />
that a channel rebrand has been announced).<br />
It does, however, broadcast more hours of<br />
current affairs than ITV (its licence requires<br />
130 hours a year, but only 10 of those in peak<br />
250<br />
).<br />
threat, and of great benefit to children<br />
themselves and their families and carers. It<br />
would be useful to put Channel 5’s status as<br />
a broadcaster catering for young children<br />
on a formal footing. The regulated children’s<br />
content should be UK-originated. In this<br />
way an important part of the public service<br />
ecology will be more reliably maintained.<br />
In return for this change to Channel 5’s<br />
licence – although this would not mark<br />
a significant change in practice for the<br />
broadcaster – we believe that Channel 5<br />
should benefit from similar guarantees on<br />
EPG prominence that we envisage for ITV (as<br />
set out above). It would also benefit from any<br />
changes resulting from further exploration of<br />
the debate on retransmission fees, an issue<br />
that it brought up in its submission to us. 251<br />
We do not view Channel 5 as such an<br />
important part of the public service television<br />
ecology as the BBC, Channel 4 or ITV.<br />
However, we would like Channel 5 to remain<br />
part of it, and propose that the regulatory<br />
commitments currently imposed on it should<br />
be maintained, with one improvement:<br />
that its laudable voluntary commitment to<br />
children’s programing should from now on<br />
be embedded in its licence. British-made<br />
children’s programming is a genre under<br />
248<br />
Viacom International Media Networks, submission to the Inquiry.<br />
249<br />
Ipsos MORI for Ofcom, An investigation into changing audience needs in a connected world, 2014, p. 48.<br />
250<br />
See the licence on the Ofcom website.<br />
251<br />
Viacom International Media Networks, submission to the Inquiry.<br />
89