01.07.2016 Views

A FUTURE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE TELEVISION CONTENT AND PLATFORMS IN A DIGITAL WORLD

FOTV-Report-Online-SP

FOTV-Report-Online-SP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CONTENT</strong> <strong>AND</strong> PLAT<strong>FOR</strong>MS <strong>IN</strong> A <strong>DIGITAL</strong> <strong>WORLD</strong><br />

Channel 5’s owner Viacom says it wants the<br />

channel to remain part of the UK’s public<br />

service broadcasting system. In its submission<br />

to us, it pointed out that Channel 5 exceeds<br />

its commitment to original programming<br />

and in fact makes a voluntary commitment<br />

to children’s programming, with an early<br />

morning strand of mostly animated content<br />

aimed at young children. 248<br />

However, Channel 5 is not widely<br />

acknowledged for its contribution to<br />

public service television. Indeed, Ofcomcommissioned<br />

research reported:<br />

“Participants of all ages expressed some<br />

surprise that Channel 5 had public service<br />

obligations.” 249 We can see why viewers felt<br />

that way. Channel Five’s schedule is best<br />

known for US dramas, Australian soaps and<br />

Big Brother, with a lot of documentaries<br />

about the benefits system (although we note<br />

that a channel rebrand has been announced).<br />

It does, however, broadcast more hours of<br />

current affairs than ITV (its licence requires<br />

130 hours a year, but only 10 of those in peak<br />

250<br />

).<br />

threat, and of great benefit to children<br />

themselves and their families and carers. It<br />

would be useful to put Channel 5’s status as<br />

a broadcaster catering for young children<br />

on a formal footing. The regulated children’s<br />

content should be UK-originated. In this<br />

way an important part of the public service<br />

ecology will be more reliably maintained.<br />

In return for this change to Channel 5’s<br />

licence – although this would not mark<br />

a significant change in practice for the<br />

broadcaster – we believe that Channel 5<br />

should benefit from similar guarantees on<br />

EPG prominence that we envisage for ITV (as<br />

set out above). It would also benefit from any<br />

changes resulting from further exploration of<br />

the debate on retransmission fees, an issue<br />

that it brought up in its submission to us. 251<br />

We do not view Channel 5 as such an<br />

important part of the public service television<br />

ecology as the BBC, Channel 4 or ITV.<br />

However, we would like Channel 5 to remain<br />

part of it, and propose that the regulatory<br />

commitments currently imposed on it should<br />

be maintained, with one improvement:<br />

that its laudable voluntary commitment to<br />

children’s programing should from now on<br />

be embedded in its licence. British-made<br />

children’s programming is a genre under<br />

248<br />

Viacom International Media Networks, submission to the Inquiry.<br />

249<br />

Ipsos MORI for Ofcom, An investigation into changing audience needs in a connected world, 2014, p. 48.<br />

250<br />

See the licence on the Ofcom website.<br />

251<br />

Viacom International Media Networks, submission to the Inquiry.<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!