A FUTURE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE TELEVISION CONTENT AND PLATFORMS IN A DIGITAL WORLD

Recommendations

Info

A FUTURE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE TELEVISION It is worth considering some of the key relationships within the television ecology and how people and ideas flow within it. Between broadcasters The UK’s leading broadcasters are all acutely aware of each other and sensitive to each other’s role in the ecology. Senior executives meet at conferences and seminars, staff at rival companies frequently interact, collaborating or socialising. They commission programmes to compete with each other and often to differentiate themselves from each other. They get inspiration from each other; they copy each other, and they learn from each other’s mistakes. Many staff move from one company to another. Broadcasters set standards for each other too. Commercial broadcasters such as ITV and Sky have to pit their arts and drama output against the publicly funded BBC. The BBC’s sports coverage has to compete with the benchmarks, including the levels of spending, set by Sky. Between broadcasters and producers Producers, whether in-house or independent, provide the output that makes broadcasting happen. Without channels or distribution networks there would be nowhere for producers to take their products. Channel 4 relies virtually entirely on independent production; indeed, its launch in 1982 gave birth to a whole industry. The production sector has expanded vastly since then thanks to quotas imposed on broadcasters and the rapid growth in channels, and now encompasses giants such as Endemol/Shine and Fremantle as well as boutique companies. Talent flows between the broadcasting and production sectors. Between broadcasters and the cultural world The BBC in particular has strong links to the cultural sector. Its support for classical music involves not just Radio 3 but funding orchestras and showing the Proms concerts. Both the BBC and Channel 4 play a very important role in film production. All broadcasters screen films, expanding the market for cinematic releases. Drama can feed off source material and then stimulate further interest in and sales for that material – Wolf Hall, for example, has been a huge success story as a novel, on the stage, and on TV. Documentaries and news items are often timed and themed to coincide with exhibitions at major museums and galleries. Between television companies and the wider creative industries The makers of television – whether broadcasters or producers – rely on the skills of so many people outside the industry. Costume designers, make-up artists and special effects experts all play a crucial part in making drama possible, for example. Musicians benefit from the exposure that TV can bring and from royalties on the use of copyright material. Between broadcasters and the public There is straightforward link between broadcasters and viewers, and in the BBC’s case a direct ownership link owing to the mechanism of the licence fee. But TV also nurtures other relationships with the public: for instance, talent shows from X Factor to The Great British Bake Off or The Choir. These shows in their very different ways not only allow the public to participate directly in television but stimulate interest in crafts and skills. 26
CONTENT AND PLATFORMS IN A DIGITAL WORLD Thinking about these relationships and the nature of the television industry as a highly developed and sophisticated ecology – as well as part of a larger creative ecology – allows us to view the challenge of maintaining public service television holistically. Necessarily, this report will examine the specific issues facing different broadcasters and analyse various programme genres and technological possibilities in turn. But improving and reforming public service television is not a matter of choosing from a menu. There is no point trying to change just one element and hoping that everything else will be fine. It is crucial that we examine today’s various challenges alongside each other and come up with solutions that value co-ordination and interaction. “THIS REPORT WILL SEEK TO DISCUSS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ABOUT, HOW BEST TO SECURE THESE “DESIRABLE SOCIAL OUTCOMES” – OF DEMOCRATIC EXCHANGE, DIVERSE REPRESENTATION AND MEANINGFUL DIALOGUE” In conclusion, we agree with Professor Robert Picard’s assessment that “there is nothing sacrosanct about public service television. It is merely a tool for achieving desirable social outcomes given the economic characteristics of broadcasting.” 51 This report will seek to discuss, and make recommendations about, how best to secure these “desirable social outcomes” – of democratic exchange, diverse representation and meaningful dialogue – in conditions of considerable technological, political and cultural volatility. The challenges that lie ahead are significant but there are also, in our view, some important opportunities. As Robin Foster from Ofcom’s Content Board put it in his submission: “The next ten years will likely see a further major shift in digital media markets…With a new approach, PST should still be in a position to achieve the enduring public service aims identified by this Inquiry and, in some cases, to do more effectively than in the past.” 52 51 Robert Picard, submission to the Inquiry. 52 Robin Foster, submission to the Inquiry. 27
Page 1 and 2: A FUTURE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE TELEVIS
Page 3 and 4: Contents Foreword by David Puttnam
Page 5 and 6: To instruct democracy, if possible
Page 7 and 8: Welcome Television is leading a cha
Page 9 and 10: CONTENT AND PLATFORMS IN A DIGITAL
Page 11 and 12: PSB channels 71.9% All other channe
Page 15 and 16: Why television matters Television i
Page 19 and 20: 1982 1990s 2012 The BBC-ITV duopoly
Page 23 and 24: Time for action Today’s policymak
Page 25: CONTENT AND PLATFORMS IN A DIGITAL
Page 29 and 30: Basic principles At the core of pre
Page 39 and 40: The multichannel revolution Perhaps
Page 51 and 52: The BBC For most people, the BBC is
Page 67 and 68: Channel 4 If the BBC is the most im
Page 71 and 72: Only 8% of Channel 4’s total spen
Page 77 and 78:
CONTENT AND PLATFORMS IN A DIGITAL
Page 79 and 80:
ITV and Channel 5 The focus of atte
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
The changing face of ITV 1993-2002
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
New sources of public service conte
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Television and diversity We have ea
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
THE PEOPLE SHOULD BE TELEVISED If t
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Nations and Regions Public service
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Content diversity One of the key wa
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Sports content now accounts for som
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Talent development and training In
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Conclusion Television is changing.
Page 155 and 156:
Recommendations General The UK’s
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Appointing the BBC board Sir David
Page 163 and 164:
APPLICATION OF THE NOLAN PRINCIPLES
Page 165 and 166:
BAFTA members’ survey delivered i
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Public service broadcasting, public
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Inquiry events Do we still need pub
Page 179 and 180:
Acknowledgements Inquiry Report Con
show all

A FUTURE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE TELEVISION CONTENT AND PLATFORMS IN A DIGITAL WORLD

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?