05.05.2012 Views

75 years of Egokiefer: Tradition and Innovation

75 years of Egokiefer: Tradition and Innovation

75 years of Egokiefer: Tradition and Innovation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Steel Technology<br />

Drawn pr<strong>of</strong>iles:<br />

from the idea to the product<br />

The sheet metal door pr<strong>of</strong>ile 735.906/T was announced at BAU 2007 in Munich <strong>and</strong> attracted<br />

considerable interest. The successful pr<strong>of</strong>ile went from idea to manufacture in an exciting manner.<br />

At the start there is a clever idea from development at Forster<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>ile Systems inspired by market analyses <strong>and</strong> customer<br />

surveys. The idea is «refined», sketched <strong>and</strong> reaches tool<br />

making. There the tube to be used is defined <strong>and</strong> the tools<br />

drawn. The tools are then manufactured, the tubes to be<br />

used welded, <strong>and</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>iles drawn. The pr<strong>of</strong>iles are then<br />

assembled <strong>and</strong> used to make doors. Sounds simple you could<br />

think. The actual route from the idea to the finished door is<br />

somewhat more complicated:<br />

When practice contradicts theory<br />

The starting point is a finished pr<strong>of</strong>ile shape from which<br />

a tool sequence is defined for the manufacturing process.<br />

For a complex shape, the steel tube used passes through<br />

several stations until the final pr<strong>of</strong>ile is complete. The individual<br />

forming steps must be exactly matched to each other.<br />

Then the exact manufacturing process is defined <strong>and</strong> the<br />

prototypes manufactured. During this activity, theory <strong>and</strong><br />

practice may drift apart. In the case <strong>of</strong> this specific project,<br />

there were problems with the drawing tip during prototype<br />

manufacture. The tips must be matched to the drawing tool<br />

due to the reduction in the cross-section <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ile shape<br />

produced. The compressed materials cannot, <strong>of</strong> course, be<br />

moved so easily through complex drawing dies. The tips must<br />

be cut in sequence. If too much is cut away, although the entire<br />

piece may pass through the drawing tool the remaining<br />

tip cross-section is insufficient to adsorb the drawing force:<br />

the tip is torn <strong>of</strong>f.<br />

Finished tools for the pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

The finished, assembled pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

39<br />

Challenges with learning effect<br />

Other difficulties arose with the point loads on the ribs, that is<br />

the term used for the inserts in the drawing tool used to form<br />

grooves or recesses. As a consequence, these ribs broke <strong>of</strong>f<br />

<strong>and</strong> had to be re-designed. Entry angles were changed, rounding<br />

radii adjusted – <strong>and</strong> then everything worked. Of course,<br />

such changes cost time. However, they also provide a significant<br />

learning effect for subsequent development work. «

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!