30.11.2016 Views

The Metaphysical Foundation of Buddhism and Modern Science

The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead

The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> conventionalized abstractions prevalent in epistemological theory are<br />

very far from the concrete facts <strong>of</strong> experience. <strong>The</strong> word 'feelin' has<br />

the merit <strong>of</strong> preserving this double significance <strong>of</strong> subjective form <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> the apprehension <strong>of</strong> an object. It avoids the disjecta membra provided<br />

by abstraction. [<strong>The</strong> genetic description <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong><br />

'emotionalization' is considered in my 'Symbolism, Its Meaning <strong>and</strong><br />

Effect' <strong>and</strong> also in Process <strong>and</strong> Reality Pt. II, Ch. VIII <strong>and</strong> throughout<br />

Pt. III.]<br />

23<br />

Section XII. Thus an occasion <strong>of</strong> human experience is one illustration <strong>of</strong><br />

the required doctrine <strong>of</strong> connectedness.<br />

Bradley's authority can be quoted in support. He writes: [Loc. cit., p. 175]<br />

"At every moment my stage <strong>of</strong> experience, whatever else it is, is a whole<br />

<strong>of</strong> which I am immediately aware. It is an experienced 'non-relational'<br />

unity <strong>of</strong> many in one." Here Bradley by 'non-relational' apparently means<br />

that experience is not a relation <strong>of</strong> an experient to something external to<br />

it, but is itself the 'inclusive whole' which is the required connectedness<br />

<strong>of</strong> 'many in one'.<br />

In this I thoroughly agree, holding that the connectedness <strong>of</strong> things is<br />

nothing else than the togetherness <strong>of</strong> things in occasions <strong>of</strong> experience.<br />

Of course, such occasions are only rarely occasions <strong>of</strong> human experience.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!