The Metaphysical Foundation of Buddhism and Modern Science
The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead
The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
16<br />
discussion any straying beyond its limits introduces neologisms,<br />
unnecessary <strong>and</strong> therefore to be regretted.<br />
This alleged fact requires examination. In the first place, if the<br />
allegation be true, it is very remarkable. It decisively places philosophy<br />
apart from the more special sciences. <strong>Modern</strong> mathematics, most secure<br />
<strong>and</strong> authoritative <strong>of</strong> sciences, is largely written in verbal <strong>and</strong> symbolic<br />
phrases which would have been unintelligible eighty years ago. In modern<br />
physics the old words, where they are still used, convey different<br />
meanings, <strong>and</strong> the new words are abundant. But it is futile to make a<br />
catalogue <strong>of</strong> the sciences accompanied by this refrain. <strong>The</strong> conclusion is<br />
obvious to the most cursory inspection.<br />
Section X. Undoubtedly, philosophy is dominated by its past literature to<br />
greater extent than any other science. And rightly so. But the claim that<br />
it has acquired a set <strong>of</strong> technical terms sufficient for its purposes, <strong>and</strong><br />
exhaustive <strong>of</strong> its meanings, is entirely unfounded. Indeed its literature is<br />
so vast, <strong>and</strong> the variations <strong>of</strong> its schools <strong>of</strong> thought so large, that there<br />
is abundant evidence <strong>of</strong> most excusable ignorance respecting verbal<br />
usages.<br />
A recent instance illustrates the vagueness <strong>of</strong> philosophical terminology.<br />
Logic is, by far, that branch <strong>of</strong> philosophy best systematized with the aid<br />
16