30.11.2016 Views

The Metaphysical Foundation of Buddhism and Modern Science

The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead

The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

plausible interpretation <strong>of</strong> such experience is that it is one <strong>of</strong> the natural<br />

activities involved in the functioning <strong>of</strong> such a high-grade organism. <strong>The</strong><br />

actualities <strong>of</strong> nature must be so interpreted as to be explanatory <strong>of</strong> this<br />

fact. This is one desideratum to be aimed at in a philosophic scheme.<br />

10<br />

Such experience seems to be more particularly related to the activities<br />

<strong>of</strong> the brain. But how far an exact doctrine can be based upon this<br />

presumption lies beyond our powers <strong>of</strong> observation. We cannot determine<br />

with what molecules the brain begins <strong>and</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the body ends.<br />

Further, we cannot tell with what molecules the body ends <strong>and</strong> the<br />

external world begins. <strong>The</strong> truth is that the brain is continuous with the<br />

body, <strong>and</strong> the body is continuous with the rest <strong>of</strong> the natural world.<br />

Human experience is an act <strong>of</strong> self-origination including the whole <strong>of</strong><br />

nature, limited to the perspective <strong>of</strong> a focal region [Cf. Process <strong>and</strong><br />

Reality Pt. II, Ch. III, especially Sects. IV-XI, <strong>and</strong> Pt, Chs. IV <strong>and</strong> V.],<br />

located within the body, but not necessarily persisting in any fixed<br />

coordination with a definite part <strong>of</strong> the brain.<br />

Section VII. <strong>The</strong> second error is the presupposition that the sole way <strong>of</strong><br />

examining experience is by acts <strong>of</strong> conscious introspective analysis. Such<br />

a doctrine <strong>of</strong> the exclusive primacy <strong>of</strong> introspection is already<br />

discredited in psychology. Each occasion <strong>of</strong> experience has its own<br />

individual pattern. Each occasion lifts some components into primacy <strong>and</strong><br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!