The Metaphysical Foundation of Buddhism and Modern Science
The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead
The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
plausible interpretation <strong>of</strong> such experience is that it is one <strong>of</strong> the natural<br />
activities involved in the functioning <strong>of</strong> such a high-grade organism. <strong>The</strong><br />
actualities <strong>of</strong> nature must be so interpreted as to be explanatory <strong>of</strong> this<br />
fact. This is one desideratum to be aimed at in a philosophic scheme.<br />
10<br />
Such experience seems to be more particularly related to the activities<br />
<strong>of</strong> the brain. But how far an exact doctrine can be based upon this<br />
presumption lies beyond our powers <strong>of</strong> observation. We cannot determine<br />
with what molecules the brain begins <strong>and</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the body ends.<br />
Further, we cannot tell with what molecules the body ends <strong>and</strong> the<br />
external world begins. <strong>The</strong> truth is that the brain is continuous with the<br />
body, <strong>and</strong> the body is continuous with the rest <strong>of</strong> the natural world.<br />
Human experience is an act <strong>of</strong> self-origination including the whole <strong>of</strong><br />
nature, limited to the perspective <strong>of</strong> a focal region [Cf. Process <strong>and</strong><br />
Reality Pt. II, Ch. III, especially Sects. IV-XI, <strong>and</strong> Pt, Chs. IV <strong>and</strong> V.],<br />
located within the body, but not necessarily persisting in any fixed<br />
coordination with a definite part <strong>of</strong> the brain.<br />
Section VII. <strong>The</strong> second error is the presupposition that the sole way <strong>of</strong><br />
examining experience is by acts <strong>of</strong> conscious introspective analysis. Such<br />
a doctrine <strong>of</strong> the exclusive primacy <strong>of</strong> introspection is already<br />
discredited in psychology. Each occasion <strong>of</strong> experience has its own<br />
individual pattern. Each occasion lifts some components into primacy <strong>and</strong><br />
10