30.11.2016 Views

The Metaphysical Foundation of Buddhism and Modern Science

The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead

The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Interpretation <strong>of</strong> MMK’s 25 chapters.<br />

In 25 out <strong>of</strong> 27 chapters, Nagarjuna emphasizes one central idea: bodies are<br />

neither together nor separated. <strong>The</strong> most important characteristic <strong>of</strong> bodies<br />

is their interdependence <strong>and</strong> the resultant, substancelessness, the<br />

impossibility <strong>of</strong> existing individually <strong>and</strong> independently. This is the meaning <strong>of</strong><br />

pratityasamutpada <strong>and</strong> sunyata: bodies are without own being <strong>and</strong> are not<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> each other. Reality does not consist <strong>of</strong> single, isolated material<br />

or immaterial components. It is not the behaviour <strong>of</strong> independent bodies but<br />

the behaviour <strong>of</strong> something between them that is essential.<br />

Let us concentrate on the 25 chapters: a thing is not independent <strong>of</strong> its<br />

conditions, nor is it identical with them. A mover does not exist without the<br />

distance within which to move. <strong>The</strong> mover <strong>and</strong> the distance are not one. A<br />

viewer is not the same as the view, but a viewer without a view does not exist.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re can be no cause without an effect, or an effect without a cause. <strong>The</strong><br />

notion ‘cause’ has no meaning without the notion ‘effect’. Cause <strong>and</strong> effect are<br />

not one, but they cannot be separated into two independent notions either.<br />

Without a characteristic, we cannot speak <strong>of</strong> a characterization, <strong>and</strong> the other<br />

way round. How could there be a desirous one without desire? When there is<br />

no action there is no agent, neither exists per se. Without fire there can be<br />

nothing designated as fuel. <strong>The</strong> material or immaterial components <strong>of</strong> a twobody<br />

or three-body system do not exist in isolation, they are not one <strong>and</strong> yet<br />

they are not independent <strong>of</strong> each other. Something is happening between these<br />

bodies <strong>and</strong> because <strong>of</strong> this they are not substantially real. For two or<br />

sometimes three complementary bodies or for two concepts like cause <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!