The Metaphysical Foundation of Buddhism and Modern Science
The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead
The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
in relation to their strict scientific purpose. Towards the end <strong>of</strong> its long<br />
life, the doctrine lost its utility <strong>and</strong> turned into an obstructive agency.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Platonic group <strong>of</strong> notions which have been considered have none <strong>of</strong><br />
the merits <strong>of</strong> the Aristotelian set. In fact, they are philosophic, <strong>and</strong> in<br />
the narrow sense are not scientific. <strong>The</strong>y suggest no detailed<br />
observation. Indeed it has always been a reproach to Plato that he<br />
diverted interest from observation <strong>of</strong> the particular facts. So far as<br />
concerns political theory, <strong>and</strong> in particular jurisprudence, this accusation<br />
is certainly untrue, <strong>and</strong> arises from the habit <strong>of</strong> concentrating interest<br />
on his Dialogues in proportion to their literary brilliance. Nevertheless<br />
the assertion is undoubtedly true in respect to physical science. But Plato<br />
had another message. Where Aristotle said ‘observe’ <strong>and</strong> ‘classify’, the<br />
moral <strong>of</strong> Plato’s teaching is the importance <strong>of</strong> the study <strong>of</strong> mathematics.<br />
Of course, neither <strong>of</strong> them was so stupid as to dissuade from observation<br />
or, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, to deny the utility <strong>of</strong> mathematics. Probably<br />
Aristotle thought that the mathematical knowledge <strong>of</strong> his day was about<br />
as much as was wanted for the purpose <strong>of</strong> physical science. Any further<br />
progress could only minister to an unpractical curiosity about subtle<br />
abstractions.<br />
An intense belief that a knowledge <strong>of</strong> mathematical relations would<br />
prove the key to unlock the mysteries <strong>of</strong> the relatedness within Nature<br />
was ever at the back <strong>of</strong> Plato’s cosmological speculations. In one passage<br />
he reprobates the swinish ignorance <strong>of</strong> those who have failed to study