The Metaphysical Foundation of Buddhism and Modern Science
The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead
The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science: Nagarjuna and Alfred North Whitehead
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
This collapse <strong>of</strong> nineteenth century dogmatism is a warning that the<br />
special sciences require that the imaginations <strong>of</strong> men be stored with<br />
imaginative possibilities as yet unutilized in the service <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />
explanation. <strong>The</strong> nearest analogy is to be seen in the history <strong>of</strong> some<br />
species <strong>of</strong> animal, or plant, or microbe, which lurks for ages as an obscure<br />
by-product <strong>of</strong> nature in some lonely jungle, or morass, or isl<strong>and</strong>. <strong>The</strong>n by<br />
some trick <strong>of</strong> circumstance it escapes into the outer world <strong>and</strong><br />
transforms a civilization, or destroys an empire or the forests <strong>of</strong> a<br />
continent. Such is the potential power <strong>of</strong> the ideas which live in the<br />
various systems <strong>of</strong> philosophy.<br />
Of course in this action, <strong>and</strong> reaction, between science <strong>and</strong> philosophy<br />
either helps the other. It is the task <strong>of</strong> philosophy to work at the<br />
concordance <strong>of</strong> ideas conceived as illustrated in the concrete facts <strong>of</strong><br />
the real world. It seeks those generalities which characterize the<br />
complete reality <strong>of</strong> fact, <strong>and</strong> apart from which any fact must sink into an<br />
abstraction. But science makes the abstraction, <strong>and</strong> is content to<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> the complete fact in respect to only some <strong>of</strong> its essential<br />
aspects. <strong>Science</strong> <strong>and</strong> Philosophy mutually criticize each other, <strong>and</strong><br />
provide imaginative material for each other. A philosophic system should<br />
present an elucidation <strong>of</strong> concrete fact from which the sciences<br />
abstract. Also the sciences should find their principles in the concrete<br />
facts which a philosophy system presents. <strong>The</strong> history <strong>of</strong> thought is the<br />
story <strong>of</strong> the measure <strong>of</strong> failure <strong>and</strong> success in this joint enterprise.