09.12.2012 Views

The Historiography of the Holocaust

The Historiography of the Holocaust

The Historiography of the Holocaust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

274 Tony Kushner<br />

69 Laqueur, <strong>The</strong> Terrible Secret; D. Lipstadt, Beyond Belief: <strong>The</strong> American Press & <strong>the</strong> Coming<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> 1933–1945 (New York: Free Press, 1986). For an alternative approach,<br />

see Kushner, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Liberal Imagination, chapter 4.<br />

70 M. Gilbert, Auschwitz and <strong>the</strong> Allies (London: Michael Joseph, 1981), p. 92 and elsewhere<br />

repeats <strong>the</strong> phrase. <strong>The</strong> television documentary version directed by Rex<br />

Bloomstein in 1982 stresses <strong>the</strong> elusive nature <strong>of</strong> Auschwitz even fur<strong>the</strong>r, and B. Rogers,<br />

‘Auschwitz and <strong>the</strong> British’ continues this tradition. For a critique see D. Engel, In <strong>the</strong><br />

Shadow <strong>of</strong> Auschwitz: <strong>The</strong> Polish Government-in-Exile and <strong>the</strong> Jews, 1939–1942 (Chapel<br />

Hill: University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina Press, 1987).<br />

71 Sharf and Lipstadt, for example, relied on press cuttings. For a social history approach,<br />

see T. Kushner, ‘Different Worlds: British Perceptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Final Solution during <strong>the</strong><br />

Second World War’, in <strong>The</strong> Final Solution: Origins and Implementation, ed. D. Cesarani<br />

(London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 246–67.<br />

72 Beller, ‘“Your Mark is Our Disgrace”’, 218–21; M. Burleigh, ‘Synonymous with<br />

Murder’, Times Literary Supplement, 3 March 1995.<br />

73 M. Smith, Foley: <strong>The</strong> Spy Who Saved 10,000 Jews (London: Hodder & Stoughton,<br />

1999), <strong>the</strong> paperback edition <strong>of</strong> which announced that it was ‘<strong>the</strong> book that<br />

uncovered Britain’s Schindler’. <strong>The</strong> phrase was used earlier on ‘Today’, BBC Radio 4,<br />

26 February 1999. On <strong>the</strong> book’s immense success, see Jewish Chronicle, 23 July and<br />

19 November 1999. Foley was later granted status by Yad Vashem as a ‘Righteous<br />

Among Nations’. See Jewish Chronicle, 22 October 1999. On Nicholas Winton, see<br />

‘Britain’s Schindler’, BBC Radio 4, 7 June 1999, written and presented by myself.<br />

Both <strong>the</strong> producer and I objected to <strong>the</strong> title, which was overruled by <strong>the</strong> BBC.<br />

<strong>The</strong> account <strong>of</strong> Winton and <strong>of</strong> British refugee policy was more complex than <strong>the</strong><br />

title suggested; A. Karpf, ‘<strong>The</strong> Future Prospects for Remembering <strong>the</strong> Past’, Jewish<br />

Chronicle, 2 July 1999. Winton was subsequently knighted. See <strong>The</strong> Guardian, 1 January<br />

2003.<br />

74 Levine, ‘From Indifference to Activism’, passim.<br />

75 Smith, Foley, pp. vi, 169; Jewish Chronicle, 23 July 1999: ‘<strong>The</strong> saintly spy <strong>of</strong> Berlin’.<br />

76 D. Cesarani, ‘Mad Dogs and Englishmen: Towards a Taxonomy <strong>of</strong> Rescuers in a<br />

“Bystander” Country: Britain 1933–45’, in ‘Bystanders’ to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Holocaust</strong>, ed. Cesarani<br />

and Levine, pp. 28–56.<br />

77 Jewish Chronicle, 18 June 1999.<br />

78 Kushner and Knox, Refugees in an Age <strong>of</strong> Genocide, pp. 154–7.<br />

79 Rubinstein, <strong>The</strong> Myth <strong>of</strong> Rescue.<br />

80 In <strong>the</strong> new introduction to <strong>the</strong> paperback edition (London: Routledge, 1999), p. 1.<br />

Rubinstein comments himself how ‘It sharply divided critics, and I became used to<br />

reading reviews consisting <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r fulsome praise or venomous hostility’. David<br />

Cesarani has commented on <strong>the</strong> division representing also those who have and have<br />

not carried out archive work on <strong>the</strong> subject. On ‘Lateline’, Australian Broadcasting<br />

Corporation, 20 July 1997.<br />

81 Mass-Observation Archive, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex: Summer Directive 2000, ‘Coming to<br />

Britain’.<br />

82 N. Stone, ‘Could <strong>the</strong> Allies Have Saved <strong>The</strong>m?’, <strong>The</strong> Guardian, 3 July 1997.<br />

83 For <strong>the</strong> increasing fascination in relation to <strong>the</strong> historiography <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Allies and <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Holocaust</strong>, see R. Breitman, Official Secrets: What <strong>the</strong> Nazis Planned, What <strong>the</strong> British<br />

and Americans Knew (New York: Hill and Wang, 1998), a book that has received<br />

widespread attention and popular success. See also <strong>the</strong> second edition <strong>of</strong> Wasserstein,<br />

Britain and <strong>the</strong> Jews <strong>of</strong> Europe (London: Leicester University Press, 1999) which includes<br />

newly available intelligence material.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!