09.12.2012 Views

1 - Nuclear Sciences and Applications - IAEA

1 - Nuclear Sciences and Applications - IAEA

1 - Nuclear Sciences and Applications - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

74 JT-60TEAM<br />

3 :<br />

LIH<br />

*3.1HA<br />

2.8HA<br />

A 2 HA<br />

• 1 HA<br />

DIV(OUTSIDE)<br />

MA<br />

1 HA<br />

OIV(LOHER)<br />

• 1 HA<br />

FIG. 5. (a) Plasma stored energy W versus absorbed heating power Pabs <strong>and</strong> (b) global energy confinement<br />

time T£ versus P^s.<br />

electron density including its radial profiles. No significant difference in the stored<br />

energy was observed among the different configurations (limiter, outside divertor <strong>and</strong><br />

lower single-null divertor) although the lower single-null discharges have a smaller<br />

plasma volume than the other configurations (by 40%).<br />

A simple offset linear relationship, W = Wo + if c Pabs, can be deduced from<br />

the experimental data. The offset value Wo is increased with Ip, while the incremental<br />

energy confinement time, rjf (=AW/APabs), is about 0.054 s; it is likely to be<br />

independent of Ip. The energy confinement time can be estimated from the equation<br />

rE = W/(Pabs - dW/dt). The relationship of TE with Pabs is shown in Fig. 5(b). The<br />

confinement time degrades with Pabs <strong>and</strong> is improved with Ip. The offset linear<br />

scaling of W yields the relationship TE = if 0 + W0/Pabs at dW/dt = 0. Further<br />

investigations are being carried out on confinement scaling including size effects.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!