09.12.2012 Views

1 - Nuclear Sciences and Applications - IAEA

1 - Nuclear Sciences and Applications - IAEA

1 - Nuclear Sciences and Applications - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

662 SCOTT et al.<br />

The TFTR "supershot" regime [13,14], characterized by high neutron emission,<br />

high ion temperatures, <strong>and</strong> a broad electron temperature profile, is<br />

generally optimized by the use of near-balanced injection. It was recognized<br />

early [2] that classical effects associated with large toroidal rotation<br />

velocities could impair the performance of purely co-injected discharges:<br />

the relative energy between the incident beam neutrals <strong>and</strong> the plasma<br />

is reduced in the rotating plasma frame, leading to poorer fusion reactivity,<br />

poorer beam penetration, <strong>and</strong> broader beam power absorption profiles;<br />

beam power invested in pushing the plasma near the center is returned as<br />

heat to the thermal ions only as viscous dissipation at larger minor radii.<br />

Whether these effects are sufficient to account for the difference between coinjection<br />

<strong>and</strong> balanced supershot injection, or alternatively whether there is<br />

an underlying difference in the energy transport, is a question of considerable<br />

interest. To address this issue, the beam power scan was supplemented<br />

by a number of balanced discharges at the same current with P\, = 14 MW<br />

(Table 1). Profile measurements of v^,{R) <strong>and</strong> Ti(R) were obtained for coinjected<br />

discharges of slightly lower power, 11.6 MW. As expected, neutron<br />

emission improved by a. factor of nearly two with balanced injection, but in<br />

many respects the balanced discharges were only marginally within the supershot<br />

regime: the density peakedness ne(0)/ rose to 2.3 (compared<br />

to 3.0 on the best supershots), <strong>and</strong> the global energy confinement time derived<br />

from diamagnetic measurements was 130 ms (compared to > 160 ms<br />

in the best supershots). Figure 5 shows the calculated ion <strong>and</strong> electron<br />

thermal diffusivities for the balanced <strong>and</strong> co-rotating plasmas. There is<br />

no significant difference between the two cases, suggesting that the rotation<br />

speed of 1.5 x 10 5 m/s at r = a/2, corresponding to mach 0.25 at this<br />

radius (mach number = v^j\JTi/m = 0.6 at the plasma, center) has little<br />

effect on heat transport.<br />

4. Plasma Rotation <strong>and</strong> Impurity Transport<br />

Impurity transport in discharges with 11-14 MW of co-, counter-, or balanced<br />

beam injection was studied by impurity transport code analysis of<br />

line emissions of germanium injected using the laser-blowoff technique. The<br />

time evolution of extreme ultraviolet lines emitted by the core ionization<br />

state Ge +29 is shown in Fig. 6. The time to peak emission <strong>and</strong> subsequent<br />

decay time were shortest for counter-injection (Trjse ==-36 msec,<br />

r(jecay ~ 50 msec), somewhat longer for co-injection (50 msec; 70 msec)<br />

<strong>and</strong> considerably longer for balanced-injection (72 msec; 115 msec), indicating<br />

that impurity confinement is longest during balanced injection. This

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!