09.12.2012 Views

1 - Nuclear Sciences and Applications - IAEA

1 - Nuclear Sciences and Applications - IAEA

1 - Nuclear Sciences and Applications - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

372 TARONI et al.<br />

3.2 3.4 3.6<br />

Radius (m)<br />

FIG. 3. (a) Experimental profiles ofTe, 7) <strong>and</strong> ne for a pellet shot (17279). Superscript I refers to the<br />

phase of enhanced confinement (t, = 44.6), superscript 2 to the following 'normal' phase (t2 = 45).<br />

TJ is fr om ECE, n[ from Abel inversion of interferometer data; T 2 t <strong>and</strong> n\ are from Lidar (not<br />

available for phase J); TJ <strong>and</strong> if from charge exchange spectroscopy. (b) 'Experimental' thermal<br />

conductivity x = X, + ("jV T/n^V Tjxi <strong>and</strong> values of rje <strong>and</strong> TJ, at R = 3.4, t = t, <strong>and</strong> t2. Similar<br />

values of-r\e <strong>and</strong> ij, are obtained from Lidar data during phase 1 of other discharges. The neoclassical<br />

(Chang-Hinton) value ofxt at t, is given for comparison.<br />

the enhanced confinement phase; the correlation, observed so far,<br />

with the evolution of the current density profile [4].<br />

Comparison of "Experimental" <strong>and</strong> Theoretical Heat Fluxes<br />

A number of models for local energy transport available in the<br />

literature (see [7,12] <strong>and</strong> the references quoted in [13]) has been<br />

compared with experimentally determined heat fluxes, in a series of<br />

ohmic, sawtoothing L-mode <strong>and</strong> "monster" discharges.<br />

Local agreement within a factor of 2 between modelled <strong>and</strong><br />

measured heat flux is accepted as fairly good, keeping in mind the<br />

uncertainties in "experimental" fluxes <strong>and</strong> the strong non-linearity<br />

(e.g. local dependence of xe on VTe) of most theoretical models.<br />

Our results indicate that in the region outside q^ = 1, where<br />

meaningful comparisons are possible, the resistive mhd model (PT<br />

model) [12] <strong>and</strong> the Rebut-Lallia (RL) model [7] predict energy<br />

fluxes in fair agreement with the observed ones. For the RL model,<br />

the discrepancy increases when VTe approaches the local critical<br />

gradient VCT (typically, near the plasma edge), suggesting that the<br />

transition to low transport below VCT might have to be smooth<br />

rather than sudden. In the same region, pure drift wave models<br />

fail to reproduce radial dependence <strong>and</strong> magnitude of the measured<br />

fluxes [13,14], The microinstability-profile consistency model of<br />

Tang [13,15], rescaled by a factor 2 is in agreement with JET<br />

data.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!