09.12.2012 Views

1 - Nuclear Sciences and Applications - IAEA

1 - Nuclear Sciences and Applications - IAEA

1 - Nuclear Sciences and Applications - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

568 TANAKA et al.<br />

Figures 3(a)-(i) show the temporal evolution of the plasma parameters in the<br />

case of the STO suppression by LHCD. When PLH (=130 kW) is injected into an<br />

OH plasma with Ip = 110 kA (a), the loop voltage VL decreases (b) <strong>and</strong> the EC<br />

emission at f = 100 GHz increases (d). These data show the generation of LH driven<br />

current carried by suprathermal tail electrons. The electron density increases continuously<br />

from rie = 1.0 to 1.8 (X 10 13 cm" 3 ) at the end of the LH pulse (c). In<br />

Figs 3(e)-(i), the detailed temporal evolution of MHD phenomena is shown. The<br />

SXR signal along the central chord (g) shows that STO appearing in the OH plasma<br />

are suppressed by LHCD. After the suppression, the MHD oscillation appears at<br />

t = 52 ms <strong>and</strong> then STO with a large amplitude <strong>and</strong> a long period reappears at<br />

56 ms. Weak MHD activity is observed on the MP signal at t = 52 ms (f). The<br />

impurity line (O V) intensity decreases slightly at the beginning of the PLH injection<br />

<strong>and</strong> then increases.<br />

Figures 4(a)-(c) show the detailed temporal evolution of the SXR signals <strong>and</strong><br />

its spatial profiles in the case of complete stabilization <strong>and</strong> subsequent destabilization<br />

of STO by LHCD. In the enlarged figures (b), showing successive crash phases of<br />

STO in the LHCD plasma, the sawteeth crash very fast (t < 20 ps). Furthermore,<br />

the two early sawteeth ((1) <strong>and</strong> (2)) accompany the precursor, while the two late sawteeth<br />

((3) <strong>and</strong> (4)) accompany neither precursor nor successor. As is shown in<br />

Fig. 4(c), the inversion radii of both STO appearing in the OH <strong>and</strong> LHCD plasmas<br />

are nearly identical <strong>and</strong> rinv « 5 cm (rinv/a = 1/4), <strong>and</strong> the radial profile of the<br />

MHD oscillation (m = 1) of the SXR signals has a peak near r = rinv. The results<br />

suggest that there is no change in the location of the q = 1 surface between these two<br />

OH <strong>and</strong> LHCD plasmas.<br />

Figure 5 shows the temporal evolution of the contour curves of the SXR signal<br />

intensity in the crash phase of STO, which is similar to (2) in Fig. 4(b). These figures<br />

were reconstructed from the SXR intensities measured by three fan diode arrays<br />

(60 SSB detectors) by means of computer tomography. These characters suggest the<br />

formation of cold plasma STO bubbles as predicted by Wesson et al. [15].<br />

4. CONCLUSIONS<br />

The 2Qe EC driven current is generated in a target plasma with pre-existing<br />

high energy tail electrons. The flat-top <strong>and</strong> ramp-up discharges are realized without<br />

OH power. The current is carried by the EC heated high energy tail electrons. The<br />

2fie ECCD efficiency is one order smaller than that of LHCD in WT-3.<br />

The MHD instability (m = 2 mode) appearing in the high current OH discharge<br />

can be suppressed by LHCD. The sawtooth oscillations in the OH discharge are<br />

suppressed <strong>and</strong> then other sawteeth appear, following the m = 1 MHD oscillation<br />

in the LHCD plasma. The latter sawteeth are not accompanied by precursors or<br />

successors <strong>and</strong> have a long period <strong>and</strong> a large amplitude compared with those in the<br />

OH discharge. Computer tomography of the SXR intensities shows the formation of<br />

cold plasma STO bubbles similar to those of JET.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!