10.12.2012 Views

String Theory and M-Theory

String Theory and M-Theory

String Theory and M-Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Black holes in string theory 551<br />

direction. However, a complete resolution of the information loss puzzle<br />

undoubtedly requires underst<strong>and</strong>ing how string theory makes sense of the<br />

singularity, where quantum gravity effects become very important. So it<br />

is fair to say that this is still an open question.<br />

• Can string theory elucidate the thermodynamic description of black holes?<br />

Does black-hole entropy have a microscopic explanation in terms of a large<br />

degeneracy of quantum states? One of the most important achievements<br />

of string theory in recent times (starting with work of Strominger <strong>and</strong><br />

Vafa) is the construction of examples that provide an affirmative answer<br />

to this question. This chapter describes explicit string solutions for which<br />

a microscopic derivation of the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy is known.<br />

• Are there black-hole solutions that correspond to single microstates rather<br />

than thermodynamic ensembles? If so, do they have a singularity <strong>and</strong> a<br />

horizon? Or do these properties arise from thermodynamic averaging?<br />

These questions are currently under discussion. However, since the answers<br />

are not yet clear, they will not be addressed further in this chapter.<br />

• What, if anything, renders black-hole singularities harmless in string theory?<br />

In some cases, as illustrated by the analysis of the conifold in Chapter<br />

9, the singularity can be “lifted” once nonperturbative states are taken<br />

into account. One natural question is whether string theory can elucidate<br />

the status of the cosmic censorship conjecture?<br />

• Does string theory forbid the appearance of closed time-like curves? Such<br />

causality-violating solutions can be constructed. There needs to be a<br />

good explanation why such solutions should or should not be rejected as<br />

unphysical. It may be that they only occur when sources have unphysical<br />

properties.<br />

• What generalizations of black-hole solutions exist in dimensions D > 4?<br />

The case of five dimensions is discussed extensively in this chapter, <strong>and</strong> explicit<br />

supersymmetric black-hole solutions are presented. Black holes fall<br />

into two categories: (1) large black holes that have finite-area horizons in<br />

the supergravity approximation; (2) small black holes that have horizons<br />

of zero area, <strong>and</strong> hence a naked singularity, in the supergravity approximation.<br />

The small black holes acquire horizons of finite area when stringy<br />

corrections to the supergravity approximation are taken into account. It<br />

seems that large supersymmetric black holes only arise for D ≤ 5. This is<br />

one reason why there has been a lot of interest in the D = 5 case. Another<br />

reason is that nonspherical horizon topologies become possible for D > 4.<br />

The example of D = 5 black rings will be described.<br />

Chapter 12 describes black p-brane solutions. Black branes are higher-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!