10.12.2012 Views

String Theory and M-Theory

String Theory and M-Theory

String Theory and M-Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8.1 Low-energy effective actions 311<br />

Action<br />

The bosonic action in the string frame for the D = 10 type IIA supergravity<br />

theory is obtained from the bosonic D = 11 action once the integration over<br />

the compact coordinate is carried out. The result contains three distinct<br />

types of terms<br />

The first term is<br />

SNS = 1<br />

2κ2 <br />

S = SNS + SR + SCS. (8.39)<br />

d 10 x √ −g e −2Φ<br />

<br />

R + 4∂µΦ∂ µ Φ − 1<br />

<br />

2<br />

|H3| . (8.40)<br />

2<br />

Note that the coefficient is 1/2κ 2 , which does not contain any powers of the<br />

string coupling constant gs. This string-frame action is characterized by the<br />

exponential dilaton dependence in front of the curvature scalar. By a Weyl<br />

rescaling of the metric, this action can be transformed to the Einstein frame<br />

in which the Einstein term has the conventional form. This is a homework<br />

problem.<br />

The remaining two terms in the action S involve the R–R fields <strong>and</strong> are<br />

given by<br />

SR = − 1<br />

4κ2 <br />

SCS = − 1<br />

4κ 2<br />

d 10 x √ <br />

−g |F2| 2 + | F4| 2<br />

, (8.41)<br />

<br />

B2 ∧ F4 ∧ F4. (8.42)<br />

As a side remark, let us point out the following: a general rule, discussed in<br />

Chapter 3, is that a world sheet of Euler characteristic χ gives a contribution<br />

with a dilaton dependence exp(χΦ), which leads to the correct dependence<br />

on the string coupling constant. All terms in the classical action Eq. (8.39)<br />

correspond to a spherical world sheet with χ = −2, because they describe<br />

the leading order of the expansion in gs. Notice, however, that the terms<br />

SR <strong>and</strong> SCS, which involve R–R fields, do not contain the expected factor<br />

of e −2Φ . This is only a consequence of the way the R–R fields have been<br />

defined. One could rescale C1 <strong>and</strong> F2 by C1 = e −Φ C1 <strong>and</strong> F2 = e −Φ F2,<br />

where F2 = d C1 − dΦ ∧ C1 <strong>and</strong> make analogous redefinitions for C3 <strong>and</strong><br />

F4. Then the factor of e −2Φ would appear in all terms. However, this field<br />

redefinition is not usually made, so the action that is displayed is in the form<br />

that is most commonly found in the literature.<br />

Supersymmetry transformations<br />

Let us now examine the supersymmetry transformations of the fermi fields<br />

to leading order in these fields. We first rewrite the gravitino variation in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!