10.12.2012 Views

String Theory and M-Theory

String Theory and M-Theory

String Theory and M-Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12.3 The AdS/CFT correspondence 657<br />

<strong>and</strong> remove all traces to make a traceless symmetric tensor. However, this<br />

is not quite the whole story. These operators can be related to multi-trace<br />

operators when n > N. By a multi-trace operator, we mean an operator<br />

that is a product of operators of the form in Eq. (12.122). Thus, to state<br />

the final conclusion, these operators provide a complete list of single-trace<br />

chiral primary operators for n = 2, 3, . . . , N. This rule reflects the fact that<br />

these are the orders of the independent Casimir invariants of SU(N). This<br />

is explored further in Exercise 12.9.<br />

These chiral primary operators form the (0, n, 0) representation of SU(4).<br />

In the large-N limit this matches perfectly with what one finds from Kaluza–<br />

Klein reduction on the five-sphere in the dual string-theory picture. It has<br />

been shown that the masses of these bulk scalar fields match the conformal<br />

dimensions of the chiral primary operators in the way required by the duality<br />

that was described earlier. It is interesting, though, that for finite N the<br />

Kaluza–Klein excitations with n > N seem to be missing in the dual gaugetheory<br />

description. This is how it should be, however. The infinite tower<br />

of Kaluza–Klein excitations actually is truncated at N. The reason will be<br />

explained later.<br />

Anomalies<br />

In general, it is difficult to compare gauge theory <strong>and</strong> string theory correlation<br />

functions, because the AdS/CFT correspondence relates weak coupling<br />

to strong coupling. However, there are certain quantities that are controlled<br />

by anomalies that can be computed exactly enabling the comparison to be<br />

made. Let us describe an example.<br />

The SU(4) R symmetry is a chiral symmetry of N = 4 super Yang–<br />

Mills theory. This is evident because left-h<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> right-h<strong>and</strong>ed fermions<br />

belong to complex-conjugate representations (4 <strong>and</strong> ¯4). If one were to add<br />

SU(4) gauge fields <strong>and</strong> make this symmetry into a local symmetry, one<br />

would obtain an inconsistent quantum theory, because the SU(4) currents<br />

would acquire an anomalous divergence<br />

(∇ µ Jµ) a = N 2 − 1<br />

384π2 i dabcɛ µνρλ F b µνF c ρλ . (12.123)<br />

Such SU(4) gauge fields are not present in the super Yang–Mills theory,<br />

so there is no inconsistency. However, they do exist in the bulk theory,<br />

where they arise by the Kaluza–Klein mechanism as a consequence of the<br />

isometry of the five-sphere. The anomaly means that if one turns on nonzero<br />

field strengths for these gauge fields the bulk theory would no longer be<br />

gauge invariant. The associated anomaly can be computed from the bulk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!