10.12.2012 Views

String Theory and M-Theory

String Theory and M-Theory

String Theory and M-Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

394 <strong>String</strong> geometry<br />

Since the prepotential is defined only up to an overall scaling, strictly speaking<br />

it is not a function but rather a section of a line bundle over the moduli<br />

space.<br />

The prepotential determines the metric on moduli space. Using the general<br />

rule for closed three-forms α <strong>and</strong> β<br />

<br />

α ∧ β = −<br />

M<br />

<br />

<br />

AI <br />

α β −<br />

AI <br />

β α , (9.116)<br />

BI<br />

I<br />

the Kähler potential (9.104) can be rewritten in the form<br />

e −K2,1<br />

I=0<br />

BI<br />

h<br />

= −i<br />

2,1<br />

<br />

X I FI<br />

¯ − X I <br />

FI , (9.117)<br />

as you are asked to verify in a homework problem. As a result, the Kähler<br />

potential is completely determined by the prepotential F , which is a holomorphic<br />

homogeneous function of degree two. This type of geometry is<br />

called special geometry.<br />

An important consequence of the product structure (9.98) of the moduli<br />

space is that the complex-structure prepotential F is exact in α ′ . Indeed,<br />

the α ′ expansion is an expansion in terms of the Calabi–Yau volume V ,<br />

which belongs to M 1,1 (M), <strong>and</strong> it is independent of position in M 2,1 (M),<br />

that is, the complex structure. 20 When combined with mirror symmetry,<br />

this important fact provides insight into an infinite series of stringy α ′ corrections<br />

involving the Kähler-structure moduli using a classical geometric<br />

computation involving the complex-structure moduli space only.<br />

The Kähler transformations<br />

The holomorphic three-form Ω is only determined up to a function f, which<br />

can depend on the moduli space coordinates X I but not on the Calabi–Yau<br />

coordinates, that is, the transformation<br />

Ω → e f(X) Ω (9.118)<br />

should not lead to new physics. This transformation does not change the<br />

Kähler metric, since under Eq. (9.118)<br />

K 2,1 → K 2,1 − f(X) − ¯ f(X), (9.119)<br />

which is a Kähler transformation that leaves the Kähler metric invariant.<br />

20 Since V <strong>and</strong> α ′ are the only scales in the problem, the only dimensionless quantity containing<br />

α ′ is (α ′ ) 3 /V . So if one knows the full V dependence, one also knows the full α ′ dependence.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!