10.12.2012 Views

String Theory and M-Theory

String Theory and M-Theory

String Theory and M-Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

434 <strong>String</strong> geometry<br />

folds, constrains M7 to have G2 holonomy. In such a compactification to<br />

flat D = 4 Minkowski space-time, there should exist one spinor (with four<br />

independent components) satisfying<br />

δψM = ∇Mε = 0. (9.211)<br />

The background geometry is then ¡ 3,1 × M7, where M7 has G2 holonomy,<br />

<strong>and</strong> ε is the covariantly constant spinor of the G2 manifold tensored with a<br />

constant spinor of ¡ 3,1 . As in the case of Calabi–Yau three-folds, Eq. (9.211)<br />

implies that M7 is Ricci flat. Of course, it cannot be Kähler, or even complex,<br />

since it has an odd dimension. Let us now examine why Eq. (9.211) implies<br />

that M7 has G2 holonomy.<br />

The exceptional group G2<br />

G2 can be defined as the subgroup of the SO(7) rotation group that preserves<br />

the form<br />

where<br />

ϕ = dy 123 + dy 145 + dy 167 + dy 246 − dy 257 − dy 347 − dy 356 , (9.212)<br />

dy ijk = dy i ∧ dy j ∧ dy k , (9.213)<br />

<strong>and</strong> y i are the coordinates of ¡ 7 . G2 is the smallest of the five exceptional<br />

simple Lie groups (G2, F4, E6, E7, E8), <strong>and</strong> it has dimension 14 <strong>and</strong> rank 2.<br />

Its Dynkin diagram is given in Fig. 9.11. Let us describe its embedding in<br />

Spin(7), the covering group of SO(7), by giving the decomposition of three<br />

representations of Spin(7), the vector 7, the spinor 8 <strong>and</strong> the adjoint 21:<br />

• Adjoint representation: decomposes under G2 as 21 = 14 + 7.<br />

• The vector representation is irreducible 7 = 7.<br />

• The spinor representation decomposes as 8 = 7 + 1.<br />

G2<br />

Fig. 9.11. The G2 Dynkin diagram.<br />

The singlet in the spinor representation precisely corresponds to the covariantly<br />

constant spinor in Eq. (9.211) <strong>and</strong> this decomposition is the reason<br />

why G2 compactifications preserve 1/8 of the original supersymmetry, leading<br />

to an N = 1 theory in four dimensions in the case of M-theory. While

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!