Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN
Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN
Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Species</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong><br />
intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/SCS/Ch9_ntl_wkshp_agenda_cheetwd_BOT.pdf<br />
(national workshop on cheetahs and wild dogs in Botswana) and http://intranet.iucn.org/<br />
webfiles/doc/SSC/SCS/Ch9_ntl_wkshp_agenda_AWCB_VIE.pdf (national workshop on<br />
Asian wild cattle and buffaloes in Vietnam). A slightly different model, but one also based<br />
on the Vision–Goals–Objectives–Actions approach, has been used successfully with<br />
several species in other fully participatory stakeholder workshops (see <strong>for</strong> example the<br />
strategies <strong>for</strong> Arabian leopard (Panthera pardus nimr) (Edmonds 2007), Caucasus leopard<br />
(Panthera pardus ciscaucasica) (Breitenmoser et al. 2007), Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx)<br />
(Mallon, Kiwan and Qarqaz in press), Przewalski’s gazelle (Procapra przewalskii) (Mallon<br />
pers. comm.), Saiga Antelope (Saiga tatarica) (CMS 2006), black rhino (Diceros bicornis)<br />
and white rhino (Ceratotherium simum) (Anon 1998, 2000a, 2000b, 2001a, 2001b, 2005,<br />
Emslie 2007, Kampamba and Chansa 2003, Okita-Ouma et al. 2007).<br />
Other useful (partial) models are provided by the recent Cheetah and African Wild Dog<br />
Regional Strategies <strong>for</strong> Eastern and Southern Africa (available in draft <strong>for</strong>m at http://<br />
intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/SCS/Ch2_Strategy_cheetwd.pdf) and their associated<br />
national Action Plans (e.g., from Kenya; see http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/SCS/<br />
Ch2_ntlAP_cheetwd_KEN.pdf). In these examples, the <strong>Strategic</strong> Plans were developed at<br />
regional workshops attended by higher-level representatives of range State wildlife<br />
authorities, other species specialists, and representatives of major relevant nongovernmental<br />
organizations (NGOs). These regional workshops were followed by a series<br />
of national action planning workshops (see Chapter 9) attended by many more range State<br />
participants, including lower-level staff from government authorities (e.g., park staff), as well<br />
as national and international NGO staff and other species specialists.<br />
2.4 Monitoring and revision of SCSs<br />
Rarely, if ever, will the available data, and the participants’ ability to predict and control the<br />
future, be adequetate to guarantee that a strategy, when first developed, will achieve the<br />
desired future <strong>for</strong> the species. For this reason, adaptive management (Walters 1986;<br />
Parma et al. 1998) has to be integral to the SCS philosophy. A SCS there<strong>for</strong>e needs to<br />
include a monitoring framework, including a process <strong>for</strong> the monitoring of Targets at the<br />
Goals and Objectives level, and timelines at the Actions level (see section 8.4).<br />
More generally, the SCS process needs to include a mechanism <strong>for</strong> continuing review and<br />
refinement. This mechanism should include ongoing compilation and review of data on<br />
species status and distribution. Thus even if a SCS is <strong>for</strong>mally published, it will often need<br />
to be an electronic “living document” subject to continual refinement (but with adequate<br />
version control so that it can be properly referenced and progress can be traced).<br />
7