Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN
Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN
Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Species</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong><br />
and Meru Betiri NPs (Java, Indonesia) by 2013;<br />
• Alaungdaw Kathapa NP, Bago Yoma Reserved Forest,<br />
and the proposed Mahamyaing WS (Myanmar) by 2013;<br />
• all Cambodian protected areas by 2018;<br />
• stabilize the populations in the Ea So area and Yok Don<br />
NP (Vietnam) by 2013 and increase them by 2018.<br />
• Determine the species’ range and status in Cambodia, China,<br />
Kalimantan (Indonesia), 6 protected areas in Lao PDR, and Myanmar<br />
by 2013, and in Sabah (Malaysia) by 2018.<br />
• Reintroduce Banteng to Leuweung Sancang NR and Cikepuh GR in<br />
Java (Indonesia; both evergreen habitat types) by 2018 and Om Koi<br />
WS (dry <strong>for</strong>est mosaic) and Chumporn Forest Complex (evergreen<br />
<strong>for</strong>est) in Thailand by 2018.<br />
6.5 The process <strong>for</strong> developing the Vision and Goals<br />
The essence of the process is a range-wide analysis of the Status Review followed by<br />
discussion within a participatory workshop environment. As already discussed (see<br />
Chapter 5), a Status Review <strong>for</strong> the species should have been initiated be<strong>for</strong>e any<br />
workshops are held, but it should also be discussed and revised at a range-wide SCS<br />
workshop. Range State stakeholders (especially government staff) should participate in the<br />
range-wide Status Review alongside other, non-government, species specialists (e.g., NGO<br />
staff and academics) to help ensure that there is broad agreement about the species’<br />
status. Workshop organisers should be aware that some range-wide Status Reviews,<br />
which have been conducted without the participation of those range State agencies with the<br />
authority and responsibility to implement conservation, have subsequently been rejected by<br />
some of those agencies. Involving multiple stakeholders at this stage also ensures that all<br />
participants in the visioning process are familiar with the species’ status across its<br />
geographic range, leading to a well-in<strong>for</strong>med consensus on what needs to be done in order<br />
to save the species.<br />
Developing the Vision, Goals, and Goal Targets (as well as the Objectives, Objective<br />
Targets, and Actions) should also take place in a participatory workshop setting (ideally at<br />
the same range-wide strategic planning workshop that discusses and revises the Status<br />
Review) to ensure adequate participation of all relevant stakeholder groups. For the<br />
majority of species, which inhabit multiple countries, such a range-wide SCS workshop is<br />
likely to be followed a series of national action planning workshops. (See also Chapter 4 on<br />
who should be involved in preparing a SCS.)<br />
Boxes 6.2 and 6.3 provide, respectively, examples of the development of a Vision and<br />
associated Goals within a workshop setting. In these examples, the range-wide Status<br />
Review and <strong>Strategic</strong> Plan were developed at an international workshop attended by<br />
higher-level range State agency representatives, species specialists, and representatives of<br />
major relevant NGOs, and then this workshop was followed by a national action planning<br />
workshop <strong>for</strong> Vietnam attended by many more range State government staff including<br />
lower-level staff (e.g., park staff), national and international NGOs, and other species<br />
specialists.<br />
45