12.12.2012 Views

Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN

Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN

Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• There are common threats to a group of species.<br />

16<br />

3. When should a SCS be developed?<br />

• There are limited resources <strong>for</strong> or interest in multiple plans <strong>for</strong> individual species in a<br />

group.<br />

Multi-species strategies would most commonly be prepared <strong>for</strong> a group of related species<br />

(e.g., the Asian Wild Cattle and Buffaloes <strong>Conservation</strong> Strategy described in Chapter 2),<br />

but it might also be beneficial to design such strategies <strong>for</strong> a group of species that have<br />

common ecological roles e.g., pollinators), share habitat (e.g., reef fish), are linked by<br />

strong ecological relationships (e.g., a predator and its prey), or face similar threats in<br />

similar areas and at similar spatial scales (e.g., cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) and African<br />

wild dogs (Lycaon pictus); <strong>IUCN</strong>/SSC in press). It may also be appropriate to develop a<br />

higher level SCS <strong>for</strong> a group of species, with more detailed species-specific SCSs <strong>for</strong> a few<br />

representative, threatened, or focal species from the group.<br />

As more species are included, the SCS may take on more of the characteristics of an areabased<br />

conservation plan (e.g., Bottrill and Pressey in press), as the Objectives and Actions<br />

will often be focused more on protection of the areas of habitat on which the suite of species<br />

depends than on measures to protect each species individually. If the group of species is<br />

vulnerable to a common threat (e.g., over-exploitation), however, then a threat-based SCS<br />

might be needed to address the cause of the threat (e.g., by reducing demand) beyond just<br />

protecting areas of habitat. Usually there will not be a rigid demarcation between speciescentred<br />

conservation plans, area-based plans, and threat-based plans, with plans focused<br />

at any of these dimensions often requiring attention to the others as well. For example, a<br />

conservation strategy <strong>for</strong> an important conservation area will often need to include specific<br />

Actions to protect a few keystone species within it, while a SCS will need to ensure that the<br />

ecological communities and systems on which the species depends continue to maintain<br />

their structure and function. Finally, we note that a species-focused conservation strategy<br />

may not be appropriate at all <strong>for</strong> some very speciose groups, if there are insufficient data to<br />

define threats to any of the species, or if the different species have ecologies, threats, and<br />

conservation needs that are too dissimilar to be addressed within a common strategy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!