Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN
Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN
Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
42<br />
6. Vision and Goals<br />
settings and in all range States” (<strong>IUCN</strong>/SSC in review).<br />
This Vision was then used in conjunction with the previously completed range-wide Status<br />
Review to derive the following Goals <strong>for</strong> Banteng (Bos javanicus), one of the nine Asian wild<br />
cattle and buffalo species:<br />
• Twenty-six ecologically functional, large populations, with 17<br />
populations in dry <strong>for</strong>est mosaic habitat types and 9 in evergreen<br />
<strong>for</strong>est habitat types; giving 4 populations in the Bornean subspecies/<br />
ESU, 6 in the Javan subspecies/ESU, and 16 in the mainland<br />
subspecies/ESU (please note that the 26 populations are identified in<br />
the Strategy).<br />
• Achieving this will require reintroductions to <strong>for</strong>mer range in Thailand<br />
and Indonesia.<br />
• All populations should co-exist with people and their domestic<br />
animals, and be valued by people in range States and internationally<br />
(<strong>IUCN</strong>/SSC in review).<br />
Box 6.3 Formulating Goals from a Vision statement: an example from the Southeast Asian<br />
Wild Cattle and Buffalo <strong>Conservation</strong> Strategy Workshop, June 2008<br />
• Once the Vision had been agreed, the Goals could be developed. Since the Goals represent<br />
the Vision defined in operational terms (see Section 6.2), a first step in developing the Goals<br />
is to compare the species’ current status (as summarised in the Status Review) with the<br />
status it would have under a future scenario in which the Vision had been achieved. One<br />
way to do this is to break down the Vision into its component parts, and to then use some<br />
sort of “scorecard” (e.g., the scorecard developed in association with the bison Vision<br />
statement, which is available at http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/SCS/<br />
Ch6_bison_scorecard.pdf) to assess each remaining population’s contribution to achieving<br />
the Vision. For example, as discussed above, the participants developing the conservation<br />
strategy <strong>for</strong> wild cattle and buffaloes in Southeast Asia agreed the following Vision: “We<br />
envision viable, ecologically functioning populations of wild cattle and buffalo that are<br />
appreciated by humankind. These populations will represent the species’ genetic diversity, in<br />
well-managed landscapes, replicated across their original ecological settings and in all range<br />
States”.<br />
• To develop the Goals, this Vision statement was broken down into its components; these<br />
included population viability, ecological functionality, appreciation by humankind, etc. Each<br />
component was then converted into a measure which could be applied to particular<br />
populations; <strong>for</strong> example, <strong>for</strong> gaur a viable population was considered to be one numbering<br />
≥500 animals, and an ecologically functional population was considered to be one which<br />
coexisted with a complete (or almost complete) set of native competitors and predators.<br />
These measures were then used to characterize each extant population according to<br />
whether or not it currently contributed to each component of the Vision (e.g., Figure 6.1).<br />
• Characterizing the extant populations in this way allowed participants to determine how the<br />
conservation or management of each population would contribute to the Vision. For<br />
example, some populations were already considered viable, ecologically functional, and<br />
appreciated by humankind; maintaining such populations was considered important to<br />
achieving the Vision, and the sites where this was needed were there<strong>for</strong>e specified in the<br />
Goals (Table 2.1). Elsewhere, management was needed to achieve the population<br />
characteristics defined in the Vision (e.g., population size needed to be increased); once<br />
again, sites needing such management were specified in the Goals (Table 2.1).