12.12.2012 Views

Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN

Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN

Strategic Planning for Species Conservation: A Handbook - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42<br />

6. Vision and Goals<br />

settings and in all range States” (<strong>IUCN</strong>/SSC in review).<br />

This Vision was then used in conjunction with the previously completed range-wide Status<br />

Review to derive the following Goals <strong>for</strong> Banteng (Bos javanicus), one of the nine Asian wild<br />

cattle and buffalo species:<br />

• Twenty-six ecologically functional, large populations, with 17<br />

populations in dry <strong>for</strong>est mosaic habitat types and 9 in evergreen<br />

<strong>for</strong>est habitat types; giving 4 populations in the Bornean subspecies/<br />

ESU, 6 in the Javan subspecies/ESU, and 16 in the mainland<br />

subspecies/ESU (please note that the 26 populations are identified in<br />

the Strategy).<br />

• Achieving this will require reintroductions to <strong>for</strong>mer range in Thailand<br />

and Indonesia.<br />

• All populations should co-exist with people and their domestic<br />

animals, and be valued by people in range States and internationally<br />

(<strong>IUCN</strong>/SSC in review).<br />

Box 6.3 Formulating Goals from a Vision statement: an example from the Southeast Asian<br />

Wild Cattle and Buffalo <strong>Conservation</strong> Strategy Workshop, June 2008<br />

• Once the Vision had been agreed, the Goals could be developed. Since the Goals represent<br />

the Vision defined in operational terms (see Section 6.2), a first step in developing the Goals<br />

is to compare the species’ current status (as summarised in the Status Review) with the<br />

status it would have under a future scenario in which the Vision had been achieved. One<br />

way to do this is to break down the Vision into its component parts, and to then use some<br />

sort of “scorecard” (e.g., the scorecard developed in association with the bison Vision<br />

statement, which is available at http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/SCS/<br />

Ch6_bison_scorecard.pdf) to assess each remaining population’s contribution to achieving<br />

the Vision. For example, as discussed above, the participants developing the conservation<br />

strategy <strong>for</strong> wild cattle and buffaloes in Southeast Asia agreed the following Vision: “We<br />

envision viable, ecologically functioning populations of wild cattle and buffalo that are<br />

appreciated by humankind. These populations will represent the species’ genetic diversity, in<br />

well-managed landscapes, replicated across their original ecological settings and in all range<br />

States”.<br />

• To develop the Goals, this Vision statement was broken down into its components; these<br />

included population viability, ecological functionality, appreciation by humankind, etc. Each<br />

component was then converted into a measure which could be applied to particular<br />

populations; <strong>for</strong> example, <strong>for</strong> gaur a viable population was considered to be one numbering<br />

≥500 animals, and an ecologically functional population was considered to be one which<br />

coexisted with a complete (or almost complete) set of native competitors and predators.<br />

These measures were then used to characterize each extant population according to<br />

whether or not it currently contributed to each component of the Vision (e.g., Figure 6.1).<br />

• Characterizing the extant populations in this way allowed participants to determine how the<br />

conservation or management of each population would contribute to the Vision. For<br />

example, some populations were already considered viable, ecologically functional, and<br />

appreciated by humankind; maintaining such populations was considered important to<br />

achieving the Vision, and the sites where this was needed were there<strong>for</strong>e specified in the<br />

Goals (Table 2.1). Elsewhere, management was needed to achieve the population<br />

characteristics defined in the Vision (e.g., population size needed to be increased); once<br />

again, sites needing such management were specified in the Goals (Table 2.1).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!