Digital Urban Simulation : Documentation of the Teaching Results from the Autumn Semester 2015

Digital Urban Simulation HS2015 – Alice Chevrier
Digital Urban Simulation HS2015 – Alice Chevrier
1000m
Figure 1.2: Connectivity
figure 1.2: Connectivity
1000m
Figure 1.2: Connectivity
1000m
1000m
Figure 1.3: Choice
figure 1.3: Choice 1000m
Minimum Average Maximum
Integration 0.0863966 0.189797 0.303238
1000m
Figure Connectivity 1.3: Choice
Choice 1 0 2.43063 50354.6 8
816741
Figure 1.4: Analysis’ values
1000m Minimum Average Maximum
Integration 0.0863966 0.189797 0.303238
Connectivity 1 2.43063 8
Choice 2. Isovists Analysis 0
50354.6 816741
Figure 1.4: Analysis’ values
figure 1.4: Analysis’ Values
In this part the 1000m
site’s isovists will be analyzed with Depthmap. The color range was set equals
throughout the different variants in order to allow a true comparison.
Besides the park, a school at the upper end of the park is being planned. This is why the influence of
2. Isovists 2. different Isovists Analysis
shapes Analysis of the
school building on the park will also be commented (fig. 2.0).
The first school building version has one building. The second is made out of two buildings. Finally the
In this In this part third part the site’s the version site’s is
isovists isovists made out
will will of
be analysed be three analyzed buildings.
with with Depthmap. It is interesting
The The colour color to note, that
range was the
was first set set equals variant’s
equals
building is
throughout
throughout lower the than different the other variants ones.
in order to allow a true comparison.
the different variants in order to allow a true comparison. Besides the park, a school at the upper end
Besides the park, a school at the upper end of the park is being planned. This is why the influence of
of the park is being planned. This is why the influence of different shapes of the school building on the
different shapes of the school building on the park will also be commented (fig. 2.0).
park The will first also school be commented building version (fig. has 2.0). one building. The second is made out of two buildings. Finally the
third version is made out of three buildings. It is interesting to note, that the first variant’s building is
The lower first school than the building other ones. version has one building. The second is made out of two buildings. Finally the
third version is made out of three buildings. It is interesting to note, that the first variant’s building is
lower than the other ones.
46
New Methods in Urban Analysis and Simulation | Final project documentation
Chair of
Information
iA Architecture
3