Digital Urban Simulation : Documentation of the Teaching Results from the Autumn Semester 2015

Integration - Difference between Status Quo & Lake Tunnel (Figure 6)
Integration - Difference between Status Quo & Lake Tunnel (Figure 6)
Integration Simulation - Status Quo vs. Lake Tunnel
Integration Simulation - Status Quo vs. Lake Tunnel
The two scenarios, Status Quo and Lake Tunnel, were analyzed with depthmap to see the difference in integration
and to visualize the effect of closing the highway ring. The analysis radius of the integration analysis was set
The
to infinity
two scenarios,
to get a picture
Status
about
Quo
the
and
city
Lake
wide
Tunnel,
hot spots.
were
The
analyzed
scales of the
with
two
depthmap
analysis results
to see
were
the
aligned
difference
to get
in
integra- comparabe tion results. and to visualize the effect of closing the highway ring. The analysis radius of the integration
analysis was set to infinity to get a picture about the city wide hot spots. The scales of the two analysis
results Since it is were not easy aligned to see to the get difference comparabe between results. figure 4 and 5, the integration results of the Status Quo scenario
were substracted from the results of the Lake Tunnel values. Figure 6 was drawn with processing and is showing
these it is differences. not easy In to figure see the 6, the difference roads whose between integration figure value 4 and changed 5, the is integration clearly visible. results of the Status
Since
Quo scenar- io were substracted from the results of the Lake Tunnel values. Figure 6 was drawn with
processing Integration is and a value is show- for the ing centrality these of differences. each segment In figure and is 6, calculated the roads by how whose far a integration segment is value in relation changed to all
is the clearly other segments. visible. Since in the Lake Tunnel scenario roads were just added and none were deleted, the integration
of all the segments gets either higher or stays more or less the same. As seen in figure 6, the integration
Integration
around the highway
is a value
ring
for
is increased
the centrality
much
of
more
each
then
segment
in the centre
and is
of
calculated
the city. Especially
by how
around
far a
the
segment
new highway
junctions the integration in the Lake Tunnel scenario is much higher than it’s value in the Status Quo scenar-
is in
relation to all the other segments. Since in the Lake Tunnel scenario roads were just added and none
io.
were deleted, the integra- tion of all the segments gets either higher or stays more or less the same.
As seen in figure 6, the integration around the highway ring is increased much more then in the centre
City-Wide, as seen in figure 4 & 5, the integration pattern stays more or less the same since the overall hot spots
of are the still city. almost Especially at the same around place. the new high- way junctions the integration in the Lake Tunnel scenario is
much higher than it’s value in the Status Quo scenario.
City-Wide, as seen in figure 4 & 5, the integration pattern stays more or less the same since the overall
hot spots are still almost at the same place.
3/13
New Methods in Urban Analysis and Simulation | Final project documentation
61