Gang Deconstruction
Gang Deconstruction
Gang Deconstruction
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
these services also permit users to send and receive private messages and talk in<br />
private chat rooms. Often a police officer may stumble upon one of these pages, or an<br />
informant can give access to the local gang page. Alternatively, they will have to<br />
formally request the needed information. Most service providers have four basic types<br />
of information about their users that may be relevant to a criminal investigation; 1) basic<br />
identity/subscriber information supplied by the user in creating the account; 2) IP log-in<br />
information; 3) files stored in a user's profile (such as "about me" information or lists of<br />
friends); and 4) user sent and received message content. It is important to know the<br />
law, and understand what the police can get service providers to do and what their<br />
capabilities are. It is also important to understand how gang members use the Internet<br />
and how the police can use their desire to be recognized and respected in their subculture<br />
against them.<br />
Debate Surrounding Impact<br />
In the UK context, law enforcement agencies are increasingly focusing enforcement<br />
efforts on gangs and gang membership. However debate persists over the extent and<br />
nature of gang activity in the UK, with some academics and policy-makers arguing that<br />
the current focus is inadvisable, given a lack of consensus over the relationship<br />
between gangs and crime.<br />
The Runnymede Trust suggests that, despite the well-rehearsed public discourse<br />
around youth gangs and "gang culture", "We actually know very little about 'gangs' in<br />
the UK: about how 'a gang' might be defined or understood, about what being in 'a<br />
gang' means... We know still less about how 'the gang' links to levels of youth violence."<br />
Professor Simon Hallsworth argues that, where they exist, gangs in the UK are "far<br />
more fluid, volatile and amorphous than the myth of the organized group with a<br />
corporate structure". This assertion is supported by a field study conducted<br />
by Manchester University, which found that "most within- and between-gang disputes...<br />
emanated from interpersonal disputes regarding friends, family and romantic<br />
relationships", as opposed to territorial rivalries, and that criminal enterprises were<br />
"rarely gang-coordinated... most involved gang members operating as individuals or in<br />
small groups."<br />
Cottrell-Boyce, writing in the Youth Justice journal, argues that gangs have been<br />
constructed as a "suitable enemy" by politicians and the media, obscuring the wider,<br />
structural roots of youth violence. At the level of enforcement, a focus on gang<br />
membership may be counterproductive; creating confusion and resulting in a drag-net<br />
approach which can criminalize innocent young people rather than focusing resources<br />
on serious violent crime.<br />
Page 27 of 110