02.10.2018 Views

Undergrad_Book_16-18_Pge_View_Print_no print marks_compressed

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Undergrad</strong>uate Research at UMass Dartmouth<br />

175<br />

St., Camden” and “5th Ave at 7th Street” in which<br />

he photographed several streets in industrial<br />

areas of Camden and Newark, New Jersey, from<br />

1979, the time of many factory closings, until 2014.<br />

Vergara (2013) describes his images as “bricks<br />

that when placed next to each other reveal shapes<br />

and meanings of neglected urban communities.”<br />

His buildings are <strong>no</strong>t ruins, they are homes. Of all<br />

the meanings that the ruin can hold to a removed<br />

observer, they can<strong>no</strong>t be more powerful than the<br />

understanding of the ruin as part of your home<br />

environment. Even if artists photograph with this in<br />

mind, these images of “gutted buildings can never<br />

adequately describe the longstanding causes of<br />

urban poverty” (Woodward, 2013). The reflective<br />

nature of a photograph allows for meditation on the<br />

subject, but without hearing from the people who<br />

are living among ruins, one can<strong>no</strong>t truly understand<br />

the basis of the ruin. Furthermore, this reflection<br />

does <strong>no</strong>t improve the neighborhood. Fetishizing<br />

ruins does <strong>no</strong>thing for the efforts to revitalize<br />

urban areas. Although the goal of this paper is to<br />

understand artistic intentions and the discourse<br />

surrounding the ruin, it is still necessary to address<br />

the abstracted nature of ruin photography.<br />

ruin exists in the hometowns of real people. As art<br />

historian Lucy Lippard once remarked, “Poverty is<br />

a great preserver of history” (Solnit, 2007, 355). It is<br />

vastly important that we understand the complexities<br />

of our own place in history without romanticizing<br />

the past, but it is exceedingly important to<br />

address the ruin <strong>no</strong>t as a hypothetical but as a real<br />

issue. The photographed post-industrial ruin points<br />

to the American past of prosperity and unequal<br />

wealth while also gesturing toward our increasingly<br />

ambiguous future. The building itself can<strong>no</strong>t stand<br />

as a reminder to this, it is <strong>no</strong>t “liminal,” or “marginal,”<br />

it is real and it must be addressed as such.<br />

While conducting my research on the portrayal of<br />

post-industrial cities in the Northeast, I worked<br />

on several off-campus research projects including<br />

one concerning the work of the re<strong>no</strong>wned American<br />

landscape painter, Albert Bierstadt, for an exhibition<br />

at the New Bedford Art Museum.<br />

The American perspective on post-industrial ruins<br />

is above all else, temporal. The ruin is at once<br />

analyzed as <strong>no</strong>stalgic, prophetic, and a timeless<br />

symbol of failure. Tied up with our understanding<br />

of ruins are our feelings about our American past,<br />

our understandings of our flawed history and our<br />

shared hopes for what the future holds. Among all<br />

these hypotheticals, however, is the fact that the<br />

Camilo Jose Vergara, 5th Ave at 7th Street, Newark. NJ, 1980.<br />

Screen-shot from the artist’s website. Screen-shot taken<br />

from www.camilojosevergara.com/Camden/Former-Camden-Free-Public-Library/1.<br />

© Camilo Jose Vergara

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!