14.02.2019 Views

Institutional Racism

Institutional Racism

Institutional Racism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

people of color. Advocates of Affirmative Action programs denied that these were 'racial<br />

quotas' as that was seen as divisive and under color of law, but affirmative action goals<br />

fell to this onslaught and subsequent reverse discrimination lawsuits ended the practice.<br />

Connerly, for his part, stated "I think that in some quarters, many parts of the country, a<br />

white male is really disadvantaged ... Because we have developed this notion of women<br />

and minorities being so disadvantaged and we have to help them, that we have, in<br />

many cases, twisted the thing so that it's no longer a case of equal opportunity. It's a<br />

case of putting a fist on the scale." His multi-racial background caused conservatives to<br />

back his cause as he was perceived to be both black and anti-affirmative action.<br />

In Education<br />

Standardized testing has also been considered a form of institutional racism, because it<br />

is believed to be biased in favor of people from particular socio-cultural backgrounds.<br />

Some minorities have consistently tested worse than whites on virtually all standardized<br />

tests, even after controlling for socioeconomic status, while others have tested<br />

consistently better. The achievement gap between white and black students mirrors the<br />

gap between the two groups in a variety of IQ tests, many of which are designed to be<br />

culturally neutral. The cause of the achievement gaps between black, Hispanic, white<br />

and Asian students has yet to be fully elucidated.<br />

In Higher Education<br />

In the 1960s, students of color started attending colleges and universities in record<br />

numbers after the passage of the Civil Rights and Higher Education Acts. However, the<br />

obstacles of integration in predominantly white institutions of higher education led to<br />

unforeseen obstacles for faculty and students of color working and studying in such<br />

environments. According to a review of educational research, tension and violence<br />

followed, one reason being the lack of preparedness of many colleges and universities<br />

to teach a diversity of students. Initially, it was also difficult for many black students to<br />

attend college due to the poor quality of education in segregated schools.<br />

The 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision was the beginning of the process of<br />

desegregation and the elimination of de jure discrimination. However, it was hard to<br />

determine the challenges that the process would present and the obstacles that would<br />

continue to exist.While the concept of "separate but equal" had been overturned by the<br />

U.S. Supreme Court, it was clear that the racial divide had not yet been gapped. As the<br />

years since Brown v. Board of Education passed, both verbal and physical abuse<br />

continued. After Brown v. Board of Education, the desegregated environment proved to<br />

be strenuous and was going to require some work. The increase of racial tension and<br />

racial incidents in institutes of higher education is said to be due to the "lack of<br />

knowledge, experience, and contact with diverse peers; peer-group influence; increased<br />

competition and stress; the influence of off-campus groups and the media; alcohol use;<br />

changing values; fear of diversity; and the perception of unfair treatment". Although<br />

Brown v. Board of Education was ruled in 1954, actual integration did not completely<br />

occur until many years later; the U.S. Supreme Court held multiple hearings on the<br />

Page 39 of 250

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!