TeamCAD BIM eBook v2 ENG

compensated by an investor
hiring a BIM Manager or BIM
Consultant. herefore, it is very
useful for all participants in the
BIM project process - including
designers of different disciplines,
contractor and investor - to work
in a cloud-based project
environment where there is no
upload of updated BIM discipline
models. In a cloud-based project
environment, BIM discipline
models remain virtually in the
cloud all the time and are
updated in real-time, and BIM
models can be considered "alive".
This means that every change in
the BIM model made by the
participants in the project is
reflected in the BIM model of
discipline in the cloud. This
provides maximum transparency
to all participants in the BIM
project process and helps to
identify multidisciplinary
problems in the project process
faster and to solve them in the
early project stages.
It is not my intention to give a
final judgment or impose my own
opinion, but after really many
projects in different cloud
common project environments,
my opinion is that the BIM 360
provides the best opportunities
for permanent coordination
between different BIM discipline
models in the BIM project
process, because all changes are
visible after the data in the BIM
discipline model is synchronized.
Such a BIM workflow enables the
investor or his BIM Consultant to
constantly monitor the progress
of the project and the level of
compatibility of the BIM model
disciplines at any point in the
project process. At the very end
of the article, I would like to make
a summary of everything I have
outlined in the article.
BEP is a necessary document for
the successful implementation of
BIM technology on a project
where the investor places a BIM
claim on the project participants.
It is logical that BEP development
is the responsibility of the
investor, as he pays for all project
life cycle costs - from the
conceptual design to the as built
project. Depending on the
experience of the BIM Manager
or BIM Consultant hired by the
investor to design the BEP and
oversee the implementation of
the requirements contained in
the BEP, the investor himself can
make significant savings at all
stages of the project process.
In the end, it is possible to have a
BIM as built model with
installations - a future digital twin
of the facility, which he can hand
over or sell to a future facility
user to track the life cycle cost of
the facility and the equipment
built into it. If an investor is also a
future user of a facility, creating a
BEP by the investor, by hiring a
BIM Manager or BIM Consultant
and overseeing the
implementation of the
requirements contained in it,
seems like the only logical option.
I would like to conclude with an
article on "What Is BEP And What
Should It Contain?" and my view
of how it can help an investor in
many areas by optimizing costs
and achieving better
functionality, both for facilities
that are not made or built and for
facilities that are built.
Until next time,
Predrag Jovanovic
050 HTTPS://WWW.TEA
TeamCAD BIM
JAN 2021