Magic and the Supernatural - Lancaster University
Magic and the Supernatural - Lancaster University
Magic and the Supernatural - Lancaster University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Juan Pablo Maggiotti<br />
__________________________________________________________________<br />
Each Venus has as her companion a love like herself. For <strong>the</strong><br />
former Venus is entranced by an innate love for underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
<strong>the</strong> Beauty of god. The latter likewise is entranced by her love<br />
for procreating that same beauty in bodies. The former Venus<br />
first embraces <strong>the</strong> splendor of divinity in herself; <strong>the</strong>n she<br />
transfers it to <strong>the</strong> second Venus. The latter Venus transfers sparks<br />
of that splendor into <strong>the</strong> Matter of <strong>the</strong> world. Because of <strong>the</strong><br />
presence of <strong>the</strong>se sparks, all of <strong>the</strong> bodies of <strong>the</strong> world seem<br />
beautiful according to <strong>the</strong> receptivity of <strong>the</strong>ir nature. 3<br />
The Plotinian effort in demonstrating <strong>the</strong> bond between contemplation <strong>and</strong><br />
creation is continued by Ficino’s metaphysics <strong>and</strong> aes<strong>the</strong>tics, placing Beauty as<br />
cause of every ontological tendency, here to contemplate it, <strong>the</strong>re to create it.<br />
On both sides [Venuses], <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong>re is a love; <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />
desire to contemplate beauty, here a desire to propagate it. Each<br />
love is virtuous <strong>and</strong> praiseworthy, for each follows a divine<br />
image. 4<br />
Ficino uses <strong>the</strong> myth of Venus as nucleus for his commentary on <strong>the</strong><br />
Symposium, but incorporating centuries of neoplatonic tradition to his<br />
hermeneutics, thanks to <strong>the</strong> doctrine of <strong>the</strong> ontological dynamism. This doctrine<br />
plays a huge role in Ficino’s <strong>the</strong>ory of art since it shows that contemplation <strong>and</strong><br />
creation are both equally necessary <strong>and</strong> simultaneous. Yet it also brings out a<br />
serious problem: even when it’s true that every creation is originated in <strong>the</strong> full<br />
perfection of <strong>the</strong> realities contemplated by <strong>the</strong> artist, it is also true that <strong>the</strong> act of<br />
creation means <strong>the</strong> imposition of forms onto matter, i.e., <strong>the</strong> corruption of <strong>the</strong><br />
model’s original <strong>and</strong> ideal perfection. 5 The procession of being is hence<br />
simultaneously acknowledged by Plotinus as an effect of Good <strong>and</strong> origin of evil.<br />
The guide for Ficino at solving this contradiction is <strong>the</strong> so-called Pseudo<br />
Dionysius <strong>the</strong> Areopagite, who explains <strong>the</strong> ontological dynamism from his notion<br />
of divine extasis. It is from Dionysius that Ficino positions Love as core of <strong>the</strong><br />
ontological dynamism.<br />
4. Love at <strong>the</strong> Heart of <strong>the</strong> Cosmos<br />
In <strong>the</strong> Areopagite, <strong>the</strong> originally Platonic idea of love as engine <strong>and</strong> cohesion of<br />
<strong>the</strong> universe is transformed in a radical way. The Plotinian necessary procession<br />
changes into free-will creation <strong>and</strong> love becomes a reciprocal relationship between<br />
God <strong>and</strong> his creatures. 6 Next to Dionysius, Ficino judges that love is <strong>the</strong> universal<br />
link between creatures only because <strong>the</strong>y’re previously affiliated to God by an act<br />
of creation. And because of this, every descent over inferior realities may come out<br />
11